135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20081785)
1. [Profile types in relation to facial angle in different skeletal jaw relationships].
Blazeyĭ Z; Tanic T; Radojicic J
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2009; 88(6):66-72. PubMed ID: 20081785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Harmonic profile according to W. Arnett in patients with different types of occlusal relations].
Blazheĭ Z; Tanich T; Radoĭchich Iu
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2009; 88(4):68-72. PubMed ID: 19738583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.
Abu Allhaija ES; Al-Khateeb SN
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 16448247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 22883980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Case report: developmental characterization of skeletal Class III malocclusion.
Sato S
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(2):105-11; discussion 111-2. PubMed ID: 8010518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Preliminary study of non-surgical treatment of severe Class III malocclusion in 18 patients of 12-20 years old].
Lin JX; Gu Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 15061874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 9267575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles.
Salehi P; Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Pakshir HR
Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):412-25. PubMed ID: 25126620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential diagnosis of skeletal open bite based on sagittal components of the face.
Arat ZM; Işeri H; Arman A
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15794041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Preliminary investigation of lower second molar extraction in correction of severe skeletal class III malocclusion].
Lin JX; Gu Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 41(9):537-41. PubMed ID: 17129425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of Gender Dimorphism on Sagittal Cephalometry in Pakistani Population.
Qamruddin I; Alam MK; Shahid F; Tanveer S; Mukhtiar M; Asim Z
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 May; 26(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 27225144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery.
Wen-Ching Ko E; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cephalometric changes in Angle Class II treatment.
Fischer-Brandies H
Int J Orthod; 1989; 27(3-4):9-13. PubMed ID: 2592152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of cephalometric norms using a unified facial and dental approach.
Anderson G; Fields HW; Beck M; Chacon G; Vig KW
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):612-8. PubMed ID: 16808567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patterns of electromyographic activity in subjects with different skeletal facial types.
Miralles R; Hevia R; Contreras L; Carvajal R; Bull R; Manns A
Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 1763838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
