These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20082004)

  • 1. The fate of metals in wastewater treated by the activated sludge process and membrane bioreactors: a brief review.
    Santos A; Judd S
    J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 20082004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Membrane bioreactors for final treatment of wastewater.
    Galil NI; Sheindorf Ch; Stahl N; Tenenbaum A; Levinsky Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):103-10. PubMed ID: 14682576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
    Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Adam C; Buisson H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fate of aromatic hydrocarbons in Italian municipal wastewater systems: an overview of wastewater treatment using conventional activated-sludge processes (CASP) and membrane bioreactors (MBRs).
    Fatone F; Di Fabio S; Bolzonella D; Cecchi F
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 20804998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nutrients removal in MBRs for municipal wastewater treatment.
    Kraume M; Bracklow U; Vocks M; Drews A
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):391-402. PubMed ID: 16004001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A pilot study on accelerated sludge degradation by a high-concentration membrane bioreactor coupled with sludge pretreatment.
    Yeom IT; Lee KR; Choi YG; Kim HS; Kwon JH; Lee UJ; Lee YH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):201-10. PubMed ID: 16459793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors.
    De Wever H; Van Roy S; Dotremont C; Miller J; Knepper T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 15497851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
    Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
    González S; Petrovic M; Barceló D
    Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
    De Wever H; Weiss S; Reemtsma T; Vereecken J; Müller J; Knepper T; Rörden O; Gonzalez S; Barcelo D; Dolores Hernando M
    Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Membrane bioreactors for winery wastewater treatment: case-studies at full scale.
    Guglielmi G; Andreottola G; Foladori P; Ziglio G
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(5):1201-7. PubMed ID: 19717906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time.
    Massé A; Spérandio M; Cabassud C
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2405-15. PubMed ID: 16759682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heavy metal removal from contaminated sludge for land application: a review.
    Babel S; del Mundo Dacera D
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(9):988-1004. PubMed ID: 16298121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the removal of phthalates and other organic pollutants from industrial wastewaters in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment plants.
    Llop A; Borrull F; Pocurull E
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(9):2425-37. PubMed ID: 19901476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nitrogen fixation in the activated sludge treatment of thermomechanical pulping wastewater: effect of dissolved oxygen.
    Slade AH; Anderson SM; Evans BG
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):1-8. PubMed ID: 14682564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hanced biological phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors.
    Adam C; Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Buisson H; Krauma M
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):281-6. PubMed ID: 12361022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance comparison of a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor and a full-scale sequencing batch reactor with sand filtration: treatment of low strength wastewater from a northern Canadian Aboriginal Community.
    Frederickson K; Cicek N
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):483-90. PubMed ID: 16004011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the behaviour of selected micropollutants in a membrane bioreactor and a conventional wastewater treatment plant.
    Clara M; Strenn B; Ausserleitner M; Kreuzinger N
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):29-36. PubMed ID: 15497826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance evaluation of hybrid and conventional sequencing batch reactor and continuous processes.
    Tam HL; Tang DT; Leung WY; Ho KM; Greenfield PF
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(10):59-65. PubMed ID: 15656296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.