These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
11. US realigns misconduct offices at NIH. Anderson C Nature; 1992 Jun; 357(6378):431. PubMed ID: 1319001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. National Institutes of Health. Healy and Dingell lock horns. Aldhous P Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6335):461. PubMed ID: 1865895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Even misconduct trials should be fair. Nature; 1991 Mar; 350(6316):259-60. PubMed ID: 2008201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Science and scandal: what can be done about scientific misconduct? Robinson A CMAJ; 1994 Sep; 151(6):831-4. PubMed ID: 8087757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. NIH takes Stewart and Feder off the misconduct beat. Mervis J Nature; 1993 Apr; 362(6422):686. PubMed ID: 8469274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Warm praise for a whistle-blower. Science; 1991 Mar; 251(5001):1552. PubMed ID: 2011730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Champions of science or blacklisting bureaucrats? Tokarski C J Am Health Policy; 1991; 1(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 10116471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law. Sise CB San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Misconduct inquiry. Disputed paper still causing problems. Anderson A; Palca J Nature; 1989 May; 339(6219):3. PubMed ID: 2716828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]