BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20082034)

  • 21. Does calculation of the 95th percentile of microbiological results offer any advantage over percentage exceedence in determining compliance with bathing water quality standards?
    Hunter PR
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2002; 34(4):283-6. PubMed ID: 11940160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Somatic coliphages and bacterial indicators of bathing water quality in the beaches of Gipuzkoa, Spain.
    Ibarluzea JM; Santa Marina L; Moreno B; Serrano E; Larburu K; Maiztegi MJ; Yarzabal A
    J Water Health; 2007 Sep; 5(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 17878556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Wet-weather urban discharges: implications from adopting the revised European Directive concerning the quality of bathing water.
    David LM; Matos JS
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(3):9-17. PubMed ID: 16206839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Development and monitoring of the hygienic water quality at bathing facilities in northwest Germany from 1989 to 1991].
    Heinemeyer EA
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1992 Oct; 193(3):211-23. PubMed ID: 1457032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Phenotypic population characteristics of the enterococci in wastewater and animal faeces: implications for the new European directive on the quality of bathing waters.
    Wallis JL; Taylor HD
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(3):27-32. PubMed ID: 12639001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficacy of monitoring and empirical predictive modeling at improving public health protection at Chicago beaches.
    Nevers MB; Whitman RL
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1659-68. PubMed ID: 21195447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Health risk of bathing in Southern California coastal waters.
    Brinks MV; Dwight RH; Osgood ND; Sharavanakumar G; Turbow DJ; El-Gohary M; Caplan JS; Semenza JC
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2008; 63(3):123-35. PubMed ID: 18980875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Revision of the EU Bathing Water Directive: economic costs and benefits.
    Georgiou S; Bateman IJ
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2005 Apr; 50(4):430-8. PubMed ID: 15823305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Escherichia coli in marine water: Comparison of methods for the assessment of recreational bathing water samples.
    Lušić DV; Jozić S; Cenov A; Glad M; Bulić M; Lušić D
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2016 Dec; 113(1-2):438-443. PubMed ID: 27771099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The public health relevance of various microbiologic marker pathogens for assessing bathing water].
    Müller HE
    Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1989 May; 51(5):233-7. PubMed ID: 2525691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implementation of the European Union's Bathing Water Directive in Turkey.
    Yukseler H; Girgin S; Yetis U; Valatka S; Semeniene D; Kerestecioglu M; Jacobsen M
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2780-4. PubMed ID: 19376634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modelling of Escherichia coli concentrations in bathing water at microtidal coasts.
    Palazón A; López I; Aragonés L; Villacampa Y; Navarro-González FJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Sep; 593-594():173-181. PubMed ID: 28346898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reducing fluxes of faecal indicator compliance parameters to bathing waters from diffuse agricultural sources: the Brighouse Bay study, Scotland.
    Kay D; Aitken M; Crowther J; Dickson I; Edwards AC; Francis C; Hopkins M; Jeffrey W; Kay C; McDonald AT; McDonald D; Stapleton CM; Watkins J; Wilkinson J; Wyer MD
    Environ Pollut; 2007 May; 147(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 17055631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of sampling depth on Escherichia coli concentrations in beach monitoring.
    Kleinheinz GT; McDermott CM; Leewis MC; Englebert E
    Water Res; 2006 Dec; 40(20):3831-7. PubMed ID: 17049581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An operational method for the real-time monitoring of E. coli numbers in bathing waters.
    Lebaron P; Henry A; Lepeuple AS; Pena G; Servais P
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2005 Jun; 50(6):652-9. PubMed ID: 15935180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical Analysis of Bathing Water Quality in Puglia Region (Italy).
    Malcangio D; Donvito C; Ungaro N
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 May; 15(5):. PubMed ID: 29772838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microbial risk classifications for recreational waters and applications to the Swan and Canning Rivers in Western Australia.
    Abbott B; Lugg R; Devine B; Cook A; Weinstein P
    J Water Health; 2011 Mar; 9(1):70-9. PubMed ID: 21301116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The disparity between regulatory measurements of E. coli in public bathing waters and the public expectation of bathing water quality.
    Quilliam RS; Taylor J; Oliver DM
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():868-874. PubMed ID: 30530277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The EU Bathing Water Directive. Risk assessment and standards].
    Dizer H; Wolf S; Fischer M; López-Pila JM; Röske I; Schmidt R; Szewzyk R; Wiedenmann A
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2005 May; 48(5):607-14. PubMed ID: 15887074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The study of diagnostic techniques for the sources of Escherichia coli at Ta-An Beach.
    Hwang HY; Fang HY
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):389-98. PubMed ID: 19633381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.