180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20082274)
41. Postoperative serum CA19-9, CEA and CA125 predicts the response to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy following radical resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Xu HX; Li S; Wu CT; Qi ZH; Wang WQ; Jin W; Gao HL; Zhang SR; Xu JZ; Liu C; Long J; Xu J; Ni QX; Yu XJ; Liu L
Pancreatology; 2018 Sep; 18(6):671-677. PubMed ID: 30153903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Significance of CEA and CA19-9 combination as a prognostic indicator and for recurrence monitoring in patients with stage II colorectal cancer.
Shibutani M; Maeda K; Nagahara H; Ohtani H; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Kubo N; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Ohira M; Hirakawa K
Anticancer Res; 2014 Jul; 34(7):3753-8. PubMed ID: 24982398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The clinical efficacy of CA 72-4 as serum marker for gastric cancer in comparison with CA19-9 and CEA.
Kodama I; Koufuji K; Kawabata S; Tetsu S; Tsuji Y; Takeda J; Kakegawa T
Int Surg; 1995; 80(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 7657491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Preliminary evaluation of clinical utility of CYFRA 21-1, CA 72-4, NSE, CA19-9 and CEA in stomach cancer.
Gwak HK; Lee JH; Park SG
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(12):4933-8. PubMed ID: 24998567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prognostic significance of tumor markers in T4a gastric cancer.
Liu X; Cai H; Wang Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2012 Apr; 10():68. PubMed ID: 22540862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Measurement of serum CA 19-9 may be more valuable than CEA in prediction of recurrence in patients with gastric cancer.
Tas F; Faruk Aykan N; Aydiner A; Yasasever V; Topuz E
Am J Clin Oncol; 2001 Apr; 24(2):148-9. PubMed ID: 11319289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Serial determinations of carcinoembryonic antigen for early detection of recurrent gastric cancer.
Tamada R; Hiramoto Y; Abe Y; Nouzuka T; Okamura T; Masuda H; Kano T; Kumashiro R; Inokuchi K
Jpn J Surg; 1982; 12(6):429-33. PubMed ID: 7166914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Combined detection of preoperative serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA242 improve prognostic prediction of surgically treated colorectal cancer patients.
Wang J; Wang X; Yu F; Chen J; Zhao S; Zhang D; Yu Y; Liu X; Tang H; Peng Z
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2015; 8(11):14853-63. PubMed ID: 26823815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of the CA19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen assays in detecting cancer of the pancreas.
Steinberg WM; Gelfand R; Anderson KK; Glenn J; Kurtzman SH; Sindelar WF; Toskes PP
Gastroenterology; 1986 Feb; 90(2):343-9. PubMed ID: 2416628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The value of postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels for the early detection of gastric cancer recurrence after curative resection.
Lee EC; Yang JY; Lee KG; Oh SY; Suh YS; Kong SH; Yang HK; Lee HJ
J Gastric Cancer; 2014 Dec; 14(4):221-8. PubMed ID: 25580353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen as a complementary tumor marker of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Kim J; Lee YS; Hwang IK; Kang BK; Cho JY; Yoon YS; Han HS; Hwang JH
J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Mar; 30(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 25729247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Combination of the serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen is a simple and accurate predictor of mortality in pancreatic cancer patients.
Kanda M; Fujii T; Takami H; Suenaga M; Inokawa Y; Yamada S; Nakayama G; Sugimoto H; Koike M; Nomoto S; Kodera Y
Surg Today; 2014 Sep; 44(9):1692-701. PubMed ID: 24114022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Predictive Early Recurrence Factors of Preoperative Clinicophysiological Findings in Pancreatic Cancer.
Suzuki S; Shimoda M; Shimazaki J; Maruyama T; Oshiro Y; Nishida K; Sahara Y; Nagakawa Y; Tsuchida A
Eur Surg Res; 2018; 59(5-6):329-338. PubMed ID: 30453288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Is it reasonable to add preoperative serum level of CEA and CA19-9 to staging for colorectal cancer?
Chen CC; Yang SH; Lin JK; Lin TC; Chen WS; Jiang JK; Wang HS; Chang SC
J Surg Res; 2005 Apr; 124(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 15820244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Prognostic significance of serum tumor markers in various pathologic subtypes of gastric cancer.
Pang C; Ma Y; Shi W; Zi M; Chen J; Liang C; Li X; Liu Z; Du Y
J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 May; 28(5):694-702. PubMed ID: 38458911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical value of tumor markers for early detection of recurrence in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma.
Tabata T; Takeshima N; Tanaka N; Hirai Y; Hasumi K
Tumour Biol; 2000; 21(6):375-80. PubMed ID: 11006578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Serum Tumor Markers and Outcomes in Patients With Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma.
Yousef A; Yousef M; Zeineddine MA; More A; Fanaeian M; Chowdhury S; Knafl M; Edelkamp P; Ito I; Gu Y; Pattalachinti V; Naini ZA; Zeineddine FA; Peterson J; Alfaro K; Foo WC; Jin J; Bhutiani N; Higbie V; Scally CP; Kee B; Kopetz S; Goldstein D; Strach M; Williamson A; Aziz O; Barriuso J; Uppal A; White MG; Helmink B; Fournier KF; Raghav KP; Taggart MW; Overman MJ; Shen JP
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e240260. PubMed ID: 38416491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Changing pattern of tumor markers in recurrent colorectal cancer patients before surgery to recurrence: serum p53 antibodies, CA19-9 and CEA.
Ushigome M; Shimada H; Miura Y; Yoshida K; Kaneko T; Koda T; Nagashima Y; Suzuki T; Kagami S; Funahashi K
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 25(4):622-632. PubMed ID: 31820210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Elevated CEA and CA19-9 serum levels independently predict advanced pancreatic cancer at diagnosis.
van Manen L; Groen JV; Putter H; Vahrmeijer AL; Swijnenburg RJ; Bonsing BA; Mieog JSD
Biomarkers; 2020 Mar; 25(2):186-193. PubMed ID: 32009482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. [Clinical value of serum CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 and CA242 in the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer].
Zhu YB; Ge SH; Zhang LH; Wang XH; Xing XF; DU H; Hu Y; Li YA; Jia YN; Lin Y; Fan B; Ji JF
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 15(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 22368025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
