194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20082676)
1. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).
Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A
J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement.
Thawer HA; Houghton PE; Woodbury MG; Keast D; Campbell K
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):46-53. PubMed ID: 12378003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional documentation of wound healing: first results of a new objective method for measurement.
Körber A; Rietkötter J; Grabbe S; Dissemond J
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2006 Oct; 4(10):848-54. PubMed ID: 17010174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry.
Gethin G; Cowman S
J Clin Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 16553755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques.
Langemo DK; Melland H; Hanson D; Olson B; Hunter S; Henly SJ
Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7):337-43. PubMed ID: 10326350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [3-dimensional documentation of wound-healing].
Körber A; Grabbe S; Dissemond J
Zentralbl Chir; 2006 Apr; 131 Suppl 1():S174-6. PubMed ID: 16575675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scaled Healing Assessment Index: a novel method for measuring the degree of wound bed preparation.
Shai A; Avrin V; Zvulunov A; Dinstein I
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 17610643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.
Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system.
Bowling FL; King L; Fadavi H; Paterson JA; Preece K; Daniel RW; Matthews DJ; Boulton AJ
Diabet Med; 2009 Jan; 26(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19125768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of venous leg ulcers with a laser-based three-dimensional method: comparison to computer planimetry with photography.
Kecelj-Leskovec N; Jezersek M; Mozina J; Pavlović MD; Lunder T
Wound Repair Regen; 2007; 15(5):767-71. PubMed ID: 17971024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A practical method for the estimation of vitiligo surface area: a comparison between the point counting and digital planimetry techniques.
Aydin F; Senturk N; Sahin B; Bek Y; Yuksel EP; Turanli AY
Eur J Dermatol; 2007; 17(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 17324824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerized planimetry versus clinical assessment for the measurement of cervical ectopia.
Morrison CS; Bright P; Blumenthal PD; Yacobson I; Kwok C; Zdenek S; Pan Z
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 184(6):1170-6. PubMed ID: 11349184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques.
Haghpanah S; Bogie K; Wang X; Banks PG; Ho CH
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1396-402. PubMed ID: 17023252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
Foltynski P
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192485. PubMed ID: 29505569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-rater reliability of sleep cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) scoring and validation of a new computer-assisted CAP scoring method.
Ferri R; Bruni O; Miano S; Smerieri A; Spruyt K; Terzano MG
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):696-707. PubMed ID: 15721084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wounds measured from digital photographs using photodigital planimetry software: validation and rater reliability.
Wendelken ME; Berg WT; Lichtenstein P; Markowitz L; Comfort C; Alvarez OM
Wounds; 2011 Sep; 23(9):267-75. PubMed ID: 25879267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A comparison of digital planimetry and transparency tracing based methods for measuring diabetic cutaneous ulcer surface area].
Wang Y; Liu G; Yuan N; Ran X
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 22(5):563-6. PubMed ID: 18630436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds.
Thompson N; Gordey L; Bowles H; Parslow N; Houghton P
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Aug; 26(8):360-73. PubMed ID: 23860221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
