These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20082676)

  • 21. Evaluation of two wound measurement methods in a multi-center, controlled study.
    Etris MB; Pribble J; LaBrecque J
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Sep; 40(7):44-8. PubMed ID: 7546090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A noncontact wound measurement system.
    Krouskop TA; Baker R; Wilson MS
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 12173754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy, tolerability and patient benefit of ultrasound-assisted wound treatment versus surgical debridement: a randomized clinical study.
    Herberger K; Franzke N; Blome C; Kirsten N; Augustin M
    Dermatology; 2011; 222(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 21464563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital image analysis versus clinical assessment of wound epithelialization: a validation study.
    Bloemen MC; Boekema BK; Vlig M; van Zuijlen PP; Middelkoop E
    Burns; 2012 Jun; 38(4):501-5. PubMed ID: 22381563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 3D photography is as accurate as digital planimetry tracing in determining burn wound area.
    Stockton KA; McMillan CM; Storey KJ; David MC; Kimble RM
    Burns; 2015 Feb; 41(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 24877886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surgical pathology to describe the clinical margin of debridement of chronic wounds using a wound electronic medical record.
    Golinko MS; Joffe R; de Vinck D; Chandrasekaran E; Stojadinovic O; Barrientos S; Vukelic S; Tomic-Canic M; Brem H
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Aug; 209(2):254-260.e1. PubMed ID: 19632603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ImageJ: A Free, Easy, and Reliable Method to Measure Leg Ulcers Using Digital Pictures.
    Aragón-Sánchez J; Quintana-Marrero Y; Aragón-Hernández C; Hernández-Herero MJ
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2017 Dec; 16(4):269-273. PubMed ID: 29251541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional digital imaging is as accurate and reliable to measure leg ulcer area as transparent tracing with digital planimetry.
    Chaby G; Lok C; Thirion JP; Lucien A; Senet P
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2017 Nov; 5(6):837-843. PubMed ID: 29037356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
    Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
    Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is Vacuum Assisted Closure a valid technique for debriding chronic leg ulcers?
    Lorée S; Dompmartin A; Penven K; Harel D; Leroy D
    J Wound Care; 2004 Jun; 13(6):249-52. PubMed ID: 15214145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving accuracy of wound measurement in clinical practice.
    Flanagan M
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Oct; 49(10):28-40. PubMed ID: 14652419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of a new laser beam wound camera and a digital photoplanimetry-based method for wound measurement in horses.
    Van Hecke LL; De Mil TA; Haspeslagh M; Chiers K; Martens AM
    Vet J; 2015 Mar; 203(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 25665920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability and measurement error of digital planimetry for the measurement of chronic venous leg ulcers.
    Stacey MC; Phillips SA; Farrokhyar F; Swaine JM
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Sep; 25(5):901-905. PubMed ID: 28922511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computerized measurement of magnetic resonance imaging erosion volumes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with existing magnetic resonance imaging scoring systems and standard clinical outcome measures.
    Bird P; Lassere M; Shnier R; Edmonds J
    Arthritis Rheum; 2003 Mar; 48(3):614-24. PubMed ID: 12632412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical observations on the use of honcrivine in the chemical debridement of wounds.
    Efem SE
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 12(4):412-5. PubMed ID: 20329683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Concurrent validation and reliability of digital image analysis of granulation tissue color for clinical pressure ulcers.
    Iizaka S; Sugama J; Nakagami G; Kaitani T; Naito A; Koyanagi H; Matsuo J; Kadono T; Konya C; Sanada H
    Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(4):455-63. PubMed ID: 21518090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Reliability of a Novel Mobile 3-dimensional Wound Measurement Device.
    Anghel EL; Kumar A; Bigham TE; Maselli KM; Steinberg JS; Evans KK; Kim PJ; Attinger CE
    Wounds; 2016 Nov; 28(11):379-386. PubMed ID: 27589359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The different methods of wound debridement.
    Stephen-Haynes J; Thompson G
    Br J Community Nurs; 2007 Jun; 12(6):S6, S8-10, S12-14, S16. PubMed ID: 17577156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Methods of measuring wound size: a comparative study.
    Plassmann P; Melhuish JM; Harding KG
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Sep; 40(7):50-2, 54, 56-60. PubMed ID: 7546091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Autologous platelet-rich fibrin matrix as cell therapy in the healing of chronic lower-extremity ulcers.
    O'Connell SM; Impeduglia T; Hessler K; Wang XJ; Carroll RJ; Dardik H
    Wound Repair Regen; 2008; 16(6):749-56. PubMed ID: 19128245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.