These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20082678)

  • 1. Responsiveness of generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life instruments to venous ulcer healing.
    Jull A; Parag V; Walker N; Rodgers A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 20082678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring the quality of life in patients with venous ulcers.
    Smith JJ; Guest MG; Greenhalgh RM; Davies AH
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Apr; 31(4):642-9. PubMed ID: 10753271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing quality of life in patients with chronic leg ulceration using the Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 questionnaire.
    Franks PJ; McCullagh L; Moffatt CJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Feb; 49(2):26-37. PubMed ID: 12598699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of internal and external responsiveness of the generic Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) with disease-specific measures in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Veehof MM; ten Klooster PM; Taal E; van Riel PL; van de Laar MA
    J Rheumatol; 2008 Apr; 35(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 18322989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health-related quality of life in venous leg ulcer patients successfully treated with Apligraf: a pilot study.
    Mathias SD; Prebil LA; Boyko WL; Fastenau J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 11074990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative responsiveness of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire and four other health-related quality of life instruments for patients with chronic lung disease.
    Puhan MA; Guyatt GH; Goldstein R; Mador J; McKim D; Stahl E; Griffith L; Schünemann HJ
    Respir Med; 2007 Feb; 101(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 16782320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The responsiveness of health status measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of disease-specific and generic instruments.
    Hagen KB; Smedstad LM; Uhlig T; Kvien TK
    J Rheumatol; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1474-80. PubMed ID: 10405932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-assessed measures of health outcome in asthma: a comparison of four approaches.
    Garratt AM; Hutchinson A; Russell I
    Respir Med; 2000 Jun; 94(6):597-606. PubMed ID: 10921766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longer-term changes in quality of life in chronic leg ulceration.
    Franks PJ; Moffatt CJ; Doherty DC; Smithdale R; Martin R
    Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(5):536-41. PubMed ID: 17014664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Specific HRQL instruments and symptom scores were more responsive than preference-based generic instruments in patients with GERD.
    Brozek JL; Guyatt GH; Heels-Ansdell D; Degl'Innocenti A; Armstrong D; Fallone CA; Wiklund I; van Zanten SV; Chiba N; Barkun AN; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 18619804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing responsiveness of generic and specific health related quality of life measures in heart failure.
    Eurich DT; Johnson JA; Reid KJ; Spertus JA
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Nov; 4():89. PubMed ID: 17125512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Error in Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire (CXVUQ).
    Jull A; Parag V
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 May; 45(5):1092. PubMed ID: 17466813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of life of people with venous leg ulcers: a comparison of the discriminative and responsive characteristics of two generic and a disease specific instruments.
    Iglesias CP; Birks Y; Nelson EA; Scanlon E; Cullum NA
    Qual Life Res; 2005 Sep; 14(7):1705-18. PubMed ID: 16119182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring quality of life in dyspeptic patients: development and validation of a new specific health status questionnaire: final report from the Italian QPD project involving 4000 patients.
    Bamfi F; Olivieri A; Arpinelli F; De Carli G; Recchia G; Gandolfi L; Norberto L; Pacini F; Surrenti C; Irvine SH; Apolone G
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Mar; 94(3):730-8. PubMed ID: 10086659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Short Form 36 health survey in spine disease--validation against condition-specific measures.
    Guilfoyle MR; Seeley H; Laing RJ
    Br J Neurosurg; 2009 Aug; 23(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 19637011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Quality of life in patients with leg ulcers in Portugal].
    Furtado K; Pina E; Franks PJ; Moffatt CJ
    Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc; 2005; 12(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 16234910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of life in people with venous leg ulcers: an integrative review.
    González-Consuegra RV; Verdú J
    J Adv Nurs; 2011 May; 67(5):926-44. PubMed ID: 21241355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding venous leg ulcer pain: results of a longitudinal study.
    Nemeth KA; Harrison MB; Graham ID; Burke S
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2004 Jan; 50(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 14712004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Venous leg ulcer patient priorities and quality of care: results of a survey.
    Kjaer ML; Mainz J; Sorensen LT; Karlsmark T; Gottrup F
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2004 Jan; 50(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 14712005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minutes to recovery after a hemodialysis session: a simple health-related quality of life question that is reliable, valid, and sensitive to change.
    Lindsay RM; Heidenheim PA; Nesrallah G; Garg AX; Suri R;
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Sep; 1(5):952-9. PubMed ID: 17699312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.