91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20083367)
1. Did I really want to know this? Pregnant women's reaction to detection of a soft marker during ultrasound screening.
Ahman A; Runestam K; Sarkadi A
Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Oct; 81(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20083367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anxiety and prenatal testing: do women with soft ultrasound findings have increased anxiety compared to women with other indications for testing?
Hoskovec J; Mastrobattista JM; Johnston D; Kerrigan A; Robbins-Furman P; Wicklund CA
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Feb; 28(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18236427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Second-trimester routine ultrasound screening: expectations and experiences in a nationwide Swedish sample.
Georgsson Ohman S; Waldenström U
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 32(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 18543374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of genetic counseling on decisions of pregnant women aged 35 years or over regarding amniocentesis in Turkey.
Ilgin-Ruhi H; Yürür-Kutlay N; Tükün A; Bökesoy I
Eur J Med Genet; 2005; 48(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 15953401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uptake of invasive prenatal diagnostic tests in women after detection of soft markers for chromosomal abnormality on ultrasonographic evaluation.
Sharda S; Phadke SR
J Perinatol; 2007 Sep; 27(9):550-5. PubMed ID: 17611609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors affecting the decision regarding amniocentesis in women at genetic risk because of age 35 years or older.
Vergani P; Locatelli A; Biffi A; Ciriello E; Zagarella A; Pezzullo JC; Ghidini A
Prenat Diagn; 2002 Sep; 22(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 12224068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's experience of maternal serum screening.
Carroll JC; Brown JB; Reid AJ; Pugh P
Can Fam Physician; 2000 Mar; 46():614-20. PubMed ID: 10752000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A meta-synthesis of pregnant women's decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for Down syndrome.
Reid B; Sinclair M; Barr O; Dobbs F; Crealey G
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 69(11):1561-73. PubMed ID: 19783085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening.
Williams C; Sandall J; Lewando-Hundt G; Heyman B; Spencer K; Grellier R
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Nov; 61(9):1983-92. PubMed ID: 15899542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Japanese women's attitudes towards routine ultrasound screening during pregnancy.
Murakami K; Tsujino K; Sase M; Nakata M; Ito M; Kutsunugi S
Nurs Health Sci; 2012 Mar; 14(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22303983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women's experiences when ultrasound examinations give unexpected findings in the second trimester.
Sommerseth E; Sundby J
Women Birth; 2010 Sep; 23(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 20153992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do women want disclosure of fetal gender during prenatal ultrasound scan?
Maaji SM; Ekele BA; Bello SO; Morhason-Bello IO
Ann Afr Med; 2010; 9(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 20418643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal testing: the perceptions and experiences of Muslim women in Australia.
Tsianakas V; Liamputtong P
J Reprod Infant Psychol; 2002 Feb; 20(1):7-24. PubMed ID: 12784816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can women's autonomy impede male involvement in pregnancy health in Katmandu, Nepal?
Mullany BC; Hindin MJ; Becker S
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Nov; 61(9):1993-2006. PubMed ID: 15922498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal anomaly screening: what do women want to know?
Lalor J; Begley C
J Adv Nurs; 2006 Jul; 55(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 16768735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why women want prenatal ultrasound in normal pregnancy.
Gudex C; Nielsen BL; Madsen M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 16435312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 1. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of Down syndrome. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.
Dick PT
CMAJ; 1996 Feb; 154(4):465-79. PubMed ID: 8630836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "Decoding" informed consent. Insights from women regarding breast cancer susceptibility testing.
Geller G; Strauss M; Bernhardt BA; Holtzman NA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(2):28-33. PubMed ID: 9131350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound soft markers of chromosomal abnormalities; an ethical dilemma for obstetricians.
Ibrahim H; Newman M
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2005; 11(2):25-7. PubMed ID: 16270447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: does clinical information inform patient decision-making?
Hunt LM; de Voogd KB; Castañeda H
Patient Educ Couns; 2005 Mar; 56(3):302-12. PubMed ID: 15721973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
