These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20083367)

  • 21. [Experiences of pregnant women with information procedures in routine ultrasound examinations].
    Sommerseth E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Apr; 113(10):1218-20. PubMed ID: 8493650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interrogating the dynamics between power, knowledge and pregnant bodies in amniocentesis decision making.
    Markens S; Browner CH; Mabel Preloran H
    Sociol Health Illn; 2010 Jan; 32(1):37-56. PubMed ID: 19891618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of religion on the attitude of primiparous women toward genetic testing.
    Usta IM; Nassar AH; Abu-Musa AA; Hannoun A
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Mar; 30(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 20087923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: women's involvement in decision-making and their attitudes to screening.
    Seror V; Ville Y
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Feb; 29(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 19123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prenatal diagnosis: chances, choices.
    Roberts SF
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 9379162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Couple dynamics during women's tobacco reduction in pregnancy and postpartum.
    Bottorff JL; Kalaw C; Johnson JL; Stewart M; Greaves L; Carey J
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2006 Aug; 8(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 16920647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Facts first, then reaction--expectant fathers' experiences of an ultrasound screening identifying soft markers.
    Åhman A; Lindgren P; Sarkadi A
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):e667-75. PubMed ID: 21920645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. "I can feel it -- my baby is healthy": women's experiences with prenatal diagnosis in Switzerland.
    Leuzinger M; Rambert B
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 11650397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perception of information, expectations and experiences among women and their partners attending a second-trimester routine ultrasound scan.
    Eurenius K; Axelsson O; Gällstedt-Fransson I; Sjöden PO
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Feb; 9(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 9132261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Psychological impact of the detection of soft markers on routine ultrasound scanning: a pilot study investigating the modifying role of information.
    Watson MS; Hall S; Langford K; Marteau TM
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Jul; 22(7):569-75. PubMed ID: 12124690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prenatal medicine related to stress and depressive reactions of pregnant women and their partners.
    Kowalcek I; Huber G; Mühlhof A; Gembruch U
    J Perinat Med; 2003; 31(3):216-24. PubMed ID: 12825477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pregnant women's attitudes toward amniocentesis before receiving Down syndrome screening results.
    Brajenović-Milić B; Babić I; Ristić S; Vraneković J; Brumini G; Kapović M
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 18180167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Viewing the unborn child - pregnant women's expectations, attitudes and experiences regarding fetal ultrasound examination.
    Øyen L; Aune I
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2016 Mar; 7():8-13. PubMed ID: 26826039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Information disclosure when screening for trisomy 21: a decision-making aid for pregnant women?].
    Seror V; Aymé S
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Feb; 30(1 Suppl):80-4. PubMed ID: 11240521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [A qualitative study of pregnant women's choice of nuchal translucency measurement].
    Lou S; Dahl K; Risør MB; Hvidman LE; Thomsen SG; Jørgensen FS; Olesen F; Kjaergaard H; Kesmodel U
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Mar; 169(10):914-8. PubMed ID: 17359736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On what grounds do women participate in prenatal screening?
    Santalahti P; Aro AR; Hemminki E; Helenius H; Ryynänen M
    Prenat Diagn; 1998 Feb; 18(2):153-65. PubMed ID: 9516017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ultrasound screening in the 2nd trimester. The pregnant woman's background knowledge, expectations, experiences and acceptances.
    Larsen T; Nguyen TH; Munk M; Svendsen L; Teisner L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 15(5):383-6. PubMed ID: 10976478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A qualitative study of mothers' and fathers' experiences of routine ultrasound examination in Sweden.
    Ekelin M; Crang-Svalenius E; Dykes AK
    Midwifery; 2004 Dec; 20(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 15571882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attitudes toward genetic carrier screening for cystic fibrosis among pregnant women: the role of health beliefs and avoidant coping style.
    Fang CY; Dunkel-Schetter C; Tatsugawa ZH; Fox MA; Bass HN; Crandall BF; Grody WW
    Womens Health; 1997; 3(1):31-51. PubMed ID: 9106369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
    Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.