These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20083367)

  • 41. [Systematic proposal and obligation of information in Down syndrome screening].
    Grangé G; Azria E
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Oct; 37(6):535-7. PubMed ID: 18760548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Seeing baby: women's experience of prenatal ultrasound examination and unexpected fetal diagnosis.
    Van der Zalm JE; Byrne PJ
    J Perinatol; 2006 Jul; 26(7):403-8. PubMed ID: 16801957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Women's experiences of unexpected ultrasound findings.
    Mitchell LM
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2004; 49(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 15134676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Women's views of ultrasonography. A comparison of women's experiences of antenatal ultrasound screening with cerebral ultrasound of their newborn infant.
    Thorpe K; Harker L; Pike A; Marlow N
    Soc Sci Med; 1993 Feb; 36(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 8426975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Expectations, emotions, and medical decision making: a case study on the use of amniocentesis.
    Browner CH; Preloran HM
    Transcult Psychiatry; 2004 Dec; 41(4):427-44. PubMed ID: 15709644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Ultrasound in obstetrics: are we getting too good?
    Abramowicz JS; Sheiner E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Apr; 274(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 16408188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pregnant patients' risk perception of prenatal test results with uncertain fetal clinical significance: ultrasound versus advanced genetic testing.
    Richards EG; Sangi-Haghpeykar H; McGuire AL; Van den Veyver IB; Fruhman G
    Prenat Diagn; 2015 Dec; 35(12):1213-7. PubMed ID: 26287960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Disclosing Secondary Findings from Pediatric Sequencing to Families: Considering the "Benefit to Families".
    Wilfond BS; Fernandez CV; Green RC
    J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(3):552-8. PubMed ID: 26479565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The "right not to know" in the genomic era: time to break from tradition?
    Berkman BE; Hull SC
    Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(3):28-31. PubMed ID: 24592837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Routine ultrasound scanning in pregnancy. The benefits are clinical ... and psychological.
    Konje JC; de Chazal R; Taylor DJ
    BMJ; 1993 Aug; 307(6903):559. PubMed ID: 8280221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else: incidental findings in recreational personal genomics.
    Greenbaum D
    Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(3):12-4. PubMed ID: 24592830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The right to an open future concerning genetic information.
    Bredenoord AL; de Vries MC; van Delden H
    Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(3):21-3. PubMed ID: 24592834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Genetic testing of children: the need for a family perspective.
    Lucassen A; Widdershoven G; Metselaar S; Fenwick A; Parker M
    Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 24592836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. "A Picture Paints a Thousand Words"-A Systematic Review of the Ethical Issues of Prenatal Ultrasound.
    Favaretto M; Rost M
    J Bioeth Inq; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39158656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinician communication after discovery of a soft marker of aneuploidy during pregnancy: A mixed methods assessment of a communication workshop.
    Johnson KM; Luff D; Macharia A; Troutman M; Lamberto A; Marchand K; Hacker MR; Brown S; O'Brien B
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 52(9):102652. PubMed ID: 37633360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Karyotyping and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Women Requesting Amniocentesis for Isolated Sonographic Soft Markers or Advanced Maternal Age.
    Tzela P; Antonakopoulos N; Anastasopoulos P; Gourounti K
    Acta Inform Med; 2021 Dec; 29(4):288-292. PubMed ID: 35197665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Based on Second-Trimester Ultrasonographic Soft Markers in Low-Risk Pregnant Women.
    Liu Y; Jing X; Xing L; Liu S; Liu J; Cheng J; Deng C; Bai T; Xia T; Wei X; Luo Y; Zhou Q; Zhu Q; Liu H
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():793894. PubMed ID: 35003226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. First and second trimester ultrasound in pregnancy: A systematic review and metasynthesis of the views and experiences of pregnant women, partners, and health workers.
    Moncrieff G; Finlayson K; Cordey S; McCrimmon R; Harris C; Barreix M; Tunçalp Ö; Downe S
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261096. PubMed ID: 34905561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The importance of information and support following a suspected second-trimester anomaly that is later discarded: A qualitative study of women's experiences.
    Thirup L; Sandager P; Vogel I; Lou S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jan; 101(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 34761374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Isolated 'soft signs' of fetal choroid plexus cysts or echogenic intracardiac focus - consequences of their continued reporting.
    Prentice G; Welsh A; Howat A; Ross D; Henry A
    Australas J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 22(4):253-264. PubMed ID: 34760567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.