251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20083593)
1. Optimizing abdominal MR imaging: approaches to common problems.
Yang RK; Roth CG; Ward RJ; deJesus JO; Mitchell DG
Radiographics; 2010 Jan; 30(1):185-99. PubMed ID: 20083593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging: optimization and artifact suppression.
Mitchell DG
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1992 Jun; 4(3):18-34. PubMed ID: 1605953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Motion artifact control in body MR imaging.
Barish MA; Jara H
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1999 May; 7(2):289-301. PubMed ID: 10382162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of motion correction effect and image quality with the periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) (BLADE) and parallel imaging acquisition technique in the upper abdomen.
Hirokawa Y; Isoda H; Maetani YS; Arizono S; Shimada K; Togashi K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Oct; 28(4):957-62. PubMed ID: 18821630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro assessment of needle artifacts with an interactive three-dimensional MR fluoroscopy system.
Thomas C; Springer F; Röthke M; Rempp H; Clasen S; Fritz J; Claussen CD; Pereira PL
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Mar; 21(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 20171560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Breath-holding three-dimensional MR imaging: evaluation of phase reordering for motion artifact suppression].
Amanuma M; Kimura T; Takizawa O; Kozawa E; Enomoto K; Watabe T; Heshiki A
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Mar; 55(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 7746722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Optimization of the technic in the study of the upper abdomen using magnetic resonance. I. Artifact reduction].
Pavone P; Patrizio G; Giuliani S; Gallucci M; Martinelli G; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 1989 Jun; 77(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 2756177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abdominal MR imaging in children: motion compensation, sequence optimization, and protocol organization.
Chavhan GB; Babyn PS; Vasanawala SS
Radiographics; 2013 May; 33(3):703-19. PubMed ID: 23674770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Navigator echo motion artifact suppression in synthetic aperture ultrasound imaging.
Kadah YM; El-Sharkawy Ael-M; Youssef AB
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 15651573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging in small rodents using a clinical 1.5 T MR scanner.
Inderbitzin D; Stoupis C; Sidler D; Gass M; Candinas D
Methods; 2007 Sep; 43(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 17720563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of motion effects on parallel MR imaging with precalibration.
Guo JY; Kholmovski EG; Zhang L; Parker DL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 25(8):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17905245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing.
Madabhushi A; Udupa JK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):561-76. PubMed ID: 15889544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging and the reduction of motion artifacts: review of the principles.
Van de Walle R; Lemahieu I; Achten E
Technol Health Care; 1997 Dec; 5(6):419-35. PubMed ID: 9696161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Origin and reduction of motion and f0 artifacts in high resolution T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: application in Alzheimer's disease patients.
Versluis MJ; Peeters JM; van Rooden S; van der Grond J; van Buchem MA; Webb AG; van Osch MJ
Neuroimage; 2010 Jul; 51(3):1082-8. PubMed ID: 20338252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bias artifact suppression on MR volumes.
Ardizzone E; Pirrone R; Gambino O
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):35-53. PubMed ID: 18644657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing cardiac MR imaging: practical remedies for artifacts.
Saremi F; Grizzard JD; Kim RJ
Radiographics; 2008; 28(4):1161-87. PubMed ID: 18635635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Motion-compensated MR valve imaging with COMB tag tracking and super-resolution enhancement.
Dowsey AW; Keegan J; Lerotic M; Thom S; Firmin D; Yang GZ
Med Image Anal; 2007 Oct; 11(5):478-91. PubMed ID: 17804277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?
Schindera ST; Merkle EM; Dale BM; Delong DM; Nelson RC
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1236-43. PubMed ID: 16979073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluation of the abdomen.
Erturk SM; Alberich-Bayarri A; Herrmann KA; Marti-Bonmati L; Ros PR
Radiographics; 2009 Oct; 29(6):1547-63. PubMed ID: 19959507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Inverse iterative correction for translational motion artifact of magnetic resonance imaging based on histogram entropy minimization].
Jiang GP; Chen WF; Hou ZS
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2005 Jun; 25(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 15958301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
