These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Journal of wound care nursing. Comparing Norton and Medley. Williams C Nurs Times; 1991 Sep 4-10; 87(36):66, 68. PubMed ID: 1886816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Decubitus ulcers in oncology, first results of a study]. Fromantin I; Routkovsky-Norval C Soins; 2003 Apr; (674):22-3. PubMed ID: 12724987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China. Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Waterlow assessment: not a predictor. Waterlow JA Br J Nurs; 2005 Jul 14-27; 14(13):689. PubMed ID: 16178097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A critique of 'at risk' pressure sore assessment tools. Smith LN; Booth N; Douglas D; Robertson WR; Walker A; Durie M; Fraser A; Hillan EH; Swaffield J J Clin Nurs; 1995 May; 4(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 7773524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Norton score and pressure sore prevention. Critique. Waterlow J; Vernon MJ; Bennett G; Gilchrist B J Wound Care; 1996 Feb; 5(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 8697139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluating the risks of pressure ulcers. The Braden scale]. Torra i Bou JE Rev Enferm; 1997 Apr; 20(224):22-30. PubMed ID: 9220862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Under pressure to update research. Ratcliffe P Nurs Times; 1998 Apr 22-28; 94(16):59-60, 63. PubMed ID: 9625968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Which pressure sore risk calculator? A study of the effectiveness of the Norton scale in Hong Kong. Chan WH; Chow KW; French P; Lai YS; Tse LK Int J Nurs Stud; 1997 Apr; 34(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 9134472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]