These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20084010)
1. The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies for Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer. Mvundura M; Grosse SD; Hampel H; Palomaki GE Genet Med; 2010 Feb; 12(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 20084010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategies to identify the Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ladabaum U; Wang G; Terdiman J; Blanco A; Kuppermann M; Boland CR; Ford J; Elkin E; Phillips KA Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 21768580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Genetic Testing Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Taiwan. Chen YE; Kao SS; Chung RH PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160599. PubMed ID: 27482709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome. Snowsill T; Huxley N; Hoyle M; Jones-Hughes T; Coelho H; Cooper C; Frayling I; Hyde C Health Technol Assess; 2014 Sep; 18(58):1-406. PubMed ID: 25244061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The predicted impact and cost-effectiveness of systematic testing of people with incident colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome. Kang YJ; Killen J; Caruana M; Simms K; Taylor N; Frayling IM; Snowsill T; Huxley N; Coupe VM; Hughes S; Freeman V; Boussioutas A; Trainer AH; Ward RL; Mitchell G; Macrae FA; Canfell K Med J Aust; 2020 Feb; 212(2):72-81. PubMed ID: 31595523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy. Pastorino R; Basile M; Tognetto A; Di Marco M; Grossi A; Lucci-Cordisco E; Scaldaferri F; De Censi A; Federici A; Villari P; Genuardi M; Ricciardi W; Boccia S PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235038. PubMed ID: 32609729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Swiss cost-effectiveness analysis of universal screening for Lynch syndrome of patients with colorectal cancer followed by cascade genetic testing of relatives. Salikhanov I; Heinimann K; Chappuis P; Buerki N; Graffeo R; Heinzelmann V; Rabaglio M; Taborelli M; Wieser S; Katapodi MC J Med Genet; 2022 Sep; 59(9):924-930. PubMed ID: 34782441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A model-based assessment of the cost-utility of strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in early-onset colorectal cancer patients. Snowsill T; Huxley N; Hoyle M; Jones-Hughes T; Coelho H; Cooper C; Frayling I; Hyde C BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():313. PubMed ID: 25910169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relatives. Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group Genet Med; 2009 Jan; 11(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19125126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of reflex testing for Lynch syndrome in women with endometrial cancer in the UK setting. Snowsill TM; Ryan NAJ; Crosbie EJ; Frayling IM; Evans DG; Hyde CJ PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221419. PubMed ID: 31469860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Universal Versus Targeted Screening for Lynch Syndrome: Comparing Ascertainment and Costs Based on Clinical Experience. Erten MZ; Fernandez LP; Ng HK; McKinnon WC; Heald B; Koliba CJ; Greenblatt MS Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Oct; 61(10):2887-2895. PubMed ID: 27384051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing women with endometrial cancer to detect Lynch syndrome. Kwon JS; Scott JL; Gilks CB; Daniels MS; Sun CC; Lu KH J Clin Oncol; 2011 Jun; 29(16):2247-52. PubMed ID: 21537049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Point: justification for Lynch syndrome screening among all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. Hampel H J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2010 May; 8(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 20495086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Economic evaluation of genetic screening for Lynch syndrome in Germany. Severin F; Stollenwerk B; Holinski-Feder E; Meyer E; Heinemann V; Giessen-Jung C; Rogowski W Genet Med; 2015 Oct; 17(10):765-73. PubMed ID: 25569434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients up to 70 years of age. Leenen CH; Goverde A; de Bekker-Grob EW; Wagner A; van Lier MG; Spaander MC; Bruno MJ; Tops CM; van den Ouweland AM; Dubbink HJ; Kuipers EJ; Dinjens WN; van Leerdam ME; Steyerberg EW Genet Med; 2016 Oct; 18(10):966-73. PubMed ID: 26938782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecular testing for Lynch syndrome in people with colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Snowsill T; Coelho H; Huxley N; Jones-Hughes T; Briscoe S; Frayling IM; Hyde C Health Technol Assess; 2017 Sep; 21(51):1-238. PubMed ID: 28895526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of selection strategies for genetic testing of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Reyes CM; Allen BA; Terdiman JP; Wilson LS Cancer; 2002 Nov; 95(9):1848-56. PubMed ID: 12404277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population. Cenin DR; Naber SK; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Jenkins MA; Buchanan DD; Preen DB; Ee HC; O'Leary P J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1737-1744. PubMed ID: 29645364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]