128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2008426)
1. Projections of the breast cancer burden to U.S. women: 1990-2000.
Kessler LG; Feuer EJ; Brown ML
Prev Med; 1991 Jan; 20(1):170-82. PubMed ID: 2008426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the impact of screening mammography: Breast cancer incidence and mortality rates in Connecticut (1943-2002).
Anderson WF; Jatoi I; Devesa SS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 16703451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recent trends in U.S. breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates.
Chu KC; Tarone RE; Kessler LG; Ries LA; Hankey BF; Miller BA; Edwards BK
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 Nov; 88(21):1571-9. PubMed ID: 8901855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How much of the recent rise in breast cancer incidence can be explained by increases in mammography utilization? A dynamic population model approach.
Feuer EJ; Wun LM
Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Dec; 136(12):1423-36. PubMed ID: 1288272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are increases in mammographic screening still a valid explanation for trends in breast cancer incidence in the United States?
Wun LM; Feuer EJ; Miller BA
Cancer Causes Control; 1995 Mar; 6(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 7749053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Obligate Overdiagnosis Due to Mammographic Screening: A Direct Estimate for U.S. Women.
Hendrick RE
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 29267146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Ernster VL; Barclay J; Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Henderson C
JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(12):913-8. PubMed ID: 8598618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of mammography on U.S. breast cancer mortality, 1975-2000: are intermediate outcome measures informative?
Habbema JD; Tan SY; Cronin KA
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2006; (36):105-11. PubMed ID: 17032900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The contribution of mammography screening to breast cancer incidence trends in the United States: an updated age-period-cohort model.
Gangnon RE; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Alagoz O; Weedon-Fekjær H; Holford TR; Trentham-Dietz A
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Jun; 24(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 25787716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V
JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 8667537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The SPECTRUM population model of the impact of screening and treatment on U.S. breast cancer trends from 1975 to 2000: principles and practice of the model methods.
Mandelblatt J; Schechter CB; Lawrence W; Yi B; Cullen J
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2006; (36):47-55. PubMed ID: 17032894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in female breast cancer in Connecticut and the United States.
Holford TR; Roush GC; McKay LA
J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 1986055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer incidence, 1980-2006: combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status.
Glass AG; Lacey JV; Carreon JD; Hoover RN
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1152-61. PubMed ID: 17652280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in breast cancer screening in Missouri from 1987 to 1995, and predictions for the years 2000 and 2010.
Sarr M; Simoes EJ; Murayi T; Figgs LT; Brownson RC
Mo Med; 1998 Dec; 95(12):663-9. PubMed ID: 9863343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
Yasmeen S; Romano PS; Pettinger M; Chlebowski RT; Robbins JA; Lane DS; Hendrix SL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 12644536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A stochastic simulation model of U.S. breast cancer mortality trends from 1975 to 2000.
Plevritis SK; Sigal BM; Salzman P; Rosenberg J; Glynn P
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2006; (36):86-95. PubMed ID: 17032898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of breast cancer incidence: is the increase due entirely to mammographic screening?
Harmer C; Staples M; Kavanagh AM
Cancer Causes Control; 1999 Oct; 10(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 10530601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.
Autier P; Boniol M
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent trends in breast cancer incidence, mortality, and mammography.
Newcomb PA; Lantz PM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1993 Nov; 28(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 8173073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammographic screening in women with a family history of breast cancer: some results from the Swedish two-county trial.
Nixon RM; Pharoah P; Tabar L; Krusemo UB; Duffy SW; Prevost TC; Chen HH
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Aug; 48(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 11011299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
