147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20084642)
1. Quantitative three-dimensional power Doppler angiography: a flow-free phantom experiment to evaluate the relationship between color gain, depth and signal artifact.
Martins WP; Raine-Fenning NJ; Ferriani RA; Nastri CO
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 35(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 20084642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a sensitivity performance index test protocol and evaluation of colour Doppler sensitivity for a range of ultrasound scanners.
Browne JE; Watson AJ; Hoskins PR; Elliott AT
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 30(11):1475-83. PubMed ID: 15588958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the effect of machine settings on quantitative three-dimensional power Doppler angiography: an in-vitro flow phantom experiment.
Raine-Fenning NJ; Nordin NM; Ramnarine KV; Campbell BK; Clewes JS; Perkins A; Johnson IR
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 18726932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Ultrasound angiography: phantom measurements of slow blood flow].
Weskott HP; Knuth C
Bildgebung; 1995 Sep; 62(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 7496115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro dual perfusion of human placental lobules as a flow phantom to investigate the relationship between fetoplacental flow and quantitative 3D power doppler angiography.
Jones NW; Hutchinson ES; Brownbill P; Crocker IP; Eccles D; Bugg GJ; Raine-Fenning NJ
Placenta; 2009 Feb; 30(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 19059643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Power Doppler signals produced by static structures: a frequent cause of interpretation errors in the study of slow flows].
Rubaltelli L; Khadivi Y; Stramare R; Candiani F; Torraco A; Tregnaghi A
Radiol Med; 2000 Mar; 99(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 10879163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A rotating cylinder phantom for flow and tissue color Doppler testing.
Walker A; Henriksen E; Ringqvist I; Ask P
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1892-8. PubMed ID: 19713031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determining the relationship between three-dimensional power Doppler data and true blood flow characteristics: an in-vitro flow phantom experiment.
Raine-Fenning NJ; Nordin NM; Ramnarine KV; Campbell BK; Clewes JS; Perkins A; Johnson IR
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):540-50. PubMed ID: 18686275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of gain adjustment on 3-dimensional power Doppler indices and on spatiotemporal image correlation volumetric pulsatility indices using a flow phantom.
Miyague AH; Raine-Fenning NJ; Pavan TZ; Polanski LT; Baumgarten MN; Nastri CO; Martins WP
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1831-6. PubMed ID: 24065264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of volumetric flow with no angle correction using multiplanar pulsed Doppler ultrasound.
Poulsen JK; Kim WY
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Jun; 43(6):589-99. PubMed ID: 8987263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The realization methods of 3D ultrasonic blood flow mapping].
Liu J; Wang Y; Gao S
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Dec; 17(4):473-7. PubMed ID: 11211844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of power Doppler gain setting on Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis indices in vivo: can use of the individual sub-noise gain level optimize information?
Collins SL; Stevenson GN; Noble JA; Impey L; Welsh AW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jul; 40(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 22009687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sources and impact of artifacts on clinical three-dimensional ultrasound imaging.
Nelson TR; Pretorius DH; Hull A; Riccabona M; Sklansky MS; James G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 16(4):374-83. PubMed ID: 11169316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing repeatability of 3D Doppler indices obtained by static 3D and STIC power Doppler: a combined in-vivo/in-vitro flow phantom study.
Miyague AH; Raine-Fenning NJ; Polanski L; Martinez LH; Araujo Júnior E; Pavan TZ; Martins WP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 42(5):571-6. PubMed ID: 23362022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Color coded ultrasound--quantification of perfusion in a perfusion model].
Wienands M; Kaiser WA
Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Sep; 6(5):257-60. PubMed ID: 8991429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Understanding the Influence of Flow Velocity, Wall Motion Filter, Pulse Repetition Frequency, and Aliasing on Power Doppler Image Quantification.
Martins MR; Martins WP; Soares CAM; Miyague AH; Kudla MJ; Pavan TZ
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):255-261. PubMed ID: 28736982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New multi-volume rendering technique for three-dimensional power Doppler imaging.
Yoo YM; Managuli R; Kim Y
Ultrasonics; 2007 Nov; 46(4):313-22. PubMed ID: 17590403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Importance of Pulse Repetition Frequency Adjustment for 3- and 4-Dimensional Power Doppler Quantification.
Miyague AH; Pavan TZ; Soares CA; De Catte L; Nastri CO; Welsh AW; Martins WP
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2245-51. PubMed ID: 26543167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Power Doppler US: evaluation of the morphology of stenoses with a flow phantom.
Claudon M; Winninger D; Briançon S; Pesque P
Radiology; 2001 Jan; 218(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 11152788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of volume vascularization index and flow index: a phantom study.
Schulten-Wijman MJ; Struijk PC; Brezinka C; De Jong N; Steegers EA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):560-4. PubMed ID: 18726935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
