These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20085197)

  • 1. Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Gfeller K; Jiang D; Oleson JJ; Driscoll V; Knutson JF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 20085197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Olszewski C; Rychener M; Sena K; Knutson JF; Witt S; Macpherson B
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 15937406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Jiang D; Oleson JJ; Driscoll V; Olszewski C; Knutson JF; Turner C; Gantz B
    J Music Ther; 2012; 49(1):68-101. PubMed ID: 22803258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tone, rhythm, and timbre perception in school-age children using cochlear implants and hearing aids.
    Innes-Brown H; Marozeau JP; Storey CM; Blamey PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):789-806. PubMed ID: 24224987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users.
    Gfeller K; Oleson J; Knutson JF; Breheny P; Driscoll V; Olszewski C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Feb; 19(2):120-34. PubMed ID: 18669126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Wright R; Uchanski RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):350-65; quiz 379. PubMed ID: 22533978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Cruz R; Jones JA; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
    Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Nash JJ; Runge CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.
    Kang R; Nimmons GL; Drennan W; Longnion J; Ruffin C; Nie K; Won JH; Worman T; Yueh B; Rubinstein J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 19474735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
    Arehart KH; Croghan NB; Muralimanohar RK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
    Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-Reported Outcomes From the United States Clinical Trial for a Hybrid Cochlear Implant.
    Kelsall DC; Arnold RJG; Lionnet L
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):1251-1261. PubMed ID: 28777227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
    Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users.
    Drennan WR; Oleson JJ; Gfeller K; Crosson J; Driscoll VD; Won JH; Anderson ES; Rubinstein JT
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 25177899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Music Listening Habits and Music Perception Abilities of Prelingually Deafened Adolescent Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Yüksel M; Atılgan A; Çiprut A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Nov; 31(10):740-745. PubMed ID: 33321542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a Stereo Music Preprocessing Scheme for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Buyens W; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29309022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment.
    Alexander AJ; Bartel L; Friesen L; Shipp D; Chen J
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21303594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hybrid Music Perception Outcomes: Implications for Melody and Timbre Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Parkinson AJ; Rubinstein JT; Drennan WR; Dodson C; Nie K
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e283-e289. PubMed ID: 30741908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Music Perception and Speech-in-Noise Skills of Typical Hearing and Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Fowler SL; Calhoun H; Warner-Czyz AD
    Am J Audiol; 2021 Mar; 30(1):170-181. PubMed ID: 33647221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.