These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20085197)

  • 41. Music perception and training for pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Jiam NT; Limb C
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2020 Nov; 17(11):1193-1206. PubMed ID: 33090055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Music and psychoacoustic perception abilities in cochlear implant users with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.
    Yüksel M; Çiprut A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109865. PubMed ID: 31945735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients.
    Gfeller K; Witt S; Adamek M; Mehr M; Rogers J; Stordahl J; Ringgenberg S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2002 Mar; 13(3):132-45. PubMed ID: 11936169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
    Cooper WB; Tobey E; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Factors Affecting Daily Cochlear Implant Use in Children: Datalogging Evidence.
    Easwar V; Sanfilippo J; Papsin B; Gordon K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016; 27(10):824-838. PubMed ID: 27885978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of Speech Performance in Bimodal versus Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Sturm JJ; Kuhlmey M; Alexiades G; Hoffman R; Kim AH
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Apr; 131(4):E1322-E1327. PubMed ID: 32876332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Risk factors for loss of ipsilateral residual hearing after hybrid cochlear implantation.
    Kopelovich JC; Reiss LA; Oleson JJ; Lundt ES; Gantz BJ; Hansen MR
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1403-8. PubMed ID: 24979394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Adunka MC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Rhythm processing in cochlear implant-mediated music perception.
    Jiam NT; Limb CJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2019 Oct; 1453(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 31168793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Predictors of health-related quality of life in adult cochlear implant recipients in South Africa.
    le Roux T; Vinck B; Butler I; Louw L; Nauta L; Schlesinger D; Swanepoel W
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Jan; 56(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 27609548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in cochlear implant listeners: A temporal processing approach.
    Saki N; Nikakhlagh S; Mirmomeni G; Bayat A
    Int Tinnitus J; 2019 Jan; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 31469526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Auditory cortical activity during cochlear implant-mediated perception of spoken language, melody, and rhythm.
    Limb CJ; Molloy AT; Jiradejvong P; Braun AR
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 19662456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Investigating cochlear implant place-pitch perception with the Modified Melodies test.
    Swanson B; Dawson P; McDermott H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2009; 10 Suppl 1():100-4. PubMed ID: 19148894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A preliminary report of music-based training for adult cochlear implant users: Rationales and development.
    Gfeller K; Guthe E; Driscoll V; Brown CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3(0 3):S22-31. PubMed ID: 26561884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perception of timbre in adult Cochlear implant users: Comparison of Iranian and Western musical instruments.
    Dasdar S; Nasresfahani A; Kianfar N; Zarandi MM; Mobedshahi F; Dabiri S; Kouhi A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2023 Jan; 24(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 36495227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing.
    Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Song recognition and appraisal: a comparison of children who use cochlear implants and normally hearing children.
    Stordahl J
    J Music Ther; 2002; 39(1):2-19. PubMed ID: 12015808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A Follow-Up Study on Music and Lexical Tone Perception in Adult Mandarin-Speaking Cochlear Implant Users.
    Gu X; Liu B; Liu Z; Qi B; Wang S; Dong R; Chen X; Zhou Q
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e421-e428. PubMed ID: 28984805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.