330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20085501)
1. Assessment of trabecular pattern on periapical and panoramic radiographs: a pilot study.
Pham D; Jonasson G; Kiliaridis S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 Mar; 68(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 20085501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Observer agreement in the assessment of mandibular trabecular bone pattern from panoramic radiographs.
Taguchi A; Tanimoto K; Suei Y; Otani K; Wadamoto M; Akagawa Y; Wada T; Rohlin M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Mar; 26(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 9442623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of marginal bone level measurements on digital panoramic and digital intraoral radiographs.
Hellén-Halme K; Lith A; Shi XQ
Oral Radiol; 2020 Apr; 36(2):135-140. PubMed ID: 31004276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandibular cortical index evaluation in masked and unmasked panoramic radiographs.
Yasar F; Sener S; Yesilova E; Akgünlü F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 19176650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A study to determine the added value of 740 screening panoramic radiographs compared to intraoral radiography in the management of adult (>18 years) dentate patients in a primary care setting.
Rushton MN; Rushton VE
J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):661-9. PubMed ID: 22542499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic agreement of conventional and inverted scanned panoramic radiographs in the detection of the mandibular canal and the mental foramen.
Sakakura CE; Loffredo Lde C; Scaf G
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 15008448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of radiographic bone height assessments in panoramic and intraoral radiographs of implant patients.
Kullman L; Al-Asfour A; Zetterqvist L; Andersson L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 17340902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fractal dimension on dental radiographs.
Bollen AM; Taguchi A; Hujoel PP; Hollender LG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):270-5. PubMed ID: 11571547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of linear measurements before and after digitizing periapical and panoramic radiography images.
Langlois Cde O; Sampaio MC; Silva AE; Costa NP; Rockenbach MI
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22011897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.
Vazquez L; Nizamaldin Y; Combescure C; Nedir R; Bischof M; Dohan Ehrenfest DM; Carrel JP; Belser UC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(2):20110429. PubMed ID: 23360688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiological assessment of periapical status using the periapical index: comparison of periapical radiography and digital panoramic radiography.
Ridao-Sacie C; Segura-Egea JJ; Fernández-Palacín A; Bullón-Fernández P; Ríos-Santos JV
Int Endod J; 2007 Jun; 40(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 17451455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visualisation of the mandibular canal by different radiographic techniques.
Lindh C; Petersson A; Klinge B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Jun; 3(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 15900674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of visual assessment of dental radiographs for identifying women at risk of having osteoporosis: the OSTEODENT project.
Lindh C; Horner K; Jonasson G; Olsson P; Rohlin M; Jacobs R; Karayianni K; van der Stelt P; Adams J; Marjanovic E; Pavitt S; Devlin H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 18299223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Panoramic radiography in the assessment of the marginal bone level.
Akesson L
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 78():1-129. PubMed ID: 1896925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Observer performance in the assessment of periapical pathology: a comparison of panoramic with periapical radiography.
Rohlin M; Kullendorff B; Ahlqwist M; Stenström B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 1807995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiographic assessment of the marginal bone level after implant treatment: a comparison of periapical and Scanora detailed narrow beam radiography.
Lofthag-Hansen S; Lindh C; Petersson A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 12775663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
