BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

601 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20085614)

  • 1. Ceramic (Feldspathic & IPS Empress II) vs. laboratory composite (Gradia) veneers; a comparison between their shear bond strength to enamel; an in vitro study.
    Nikzad S; Azari A; Dehgan S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 20085614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel.
    Cura C; Saraçoglu A; Cötert HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 12690353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic.
    Ayad MF; Fahmy NZ; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 18262013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
    Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shear bond strength between feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramic and human dentine for two adhesive cements.
    Graiff L; Piovan C; Vigolo P; Mason PN
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 18266655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of die spacer thickness on shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers.
    Cho SH; Chang WG; Lim BS; Lee YK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 16543017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of different etching times of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the shear bond strength of high-leucite ceramics bonded to composite resin.
    Kukiattrakoon B; Thammasitboon K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jul; 98(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 17631170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems.
    Ozcan M; Valandro LF; Amaral R; Leite F; Bottino MA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1477-83. PubMed ID: 19671476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repair strength of etched vs silica-coated metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Sindel J
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 11203818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adhesive bonding of resin composite to various Ni-Cr alloy surfaces using different metal conditioners and a surface modification system.
    Almilhatti HJ; Giampaolo ET; Vergani CE; Machado AL; Pavarina AC; Betiol EA
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):663-9. PubMed ID: 19523025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics.
    Dündar M; Ozcan M; Gökçe B; Cömlekoğlu E; Leite F; Valandro LF
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16844212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates.
    Haselton DR; Diaz-Arnold AM; Dunne JT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 11725281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: Part 1. Comparison of shear bond strengths between different metal-resin bonding systems and a metal-ceramic system.
    Petridis H; Garefis P; Hirayama H; Kafantaris NM; Koidis PT
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):635-9. PubMed ID: 14714844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin.
    Atsu SS; Kilicarslan MA; Kucukesmen HC; Aka PS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):430-6. PubMed ID: 16765155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials.
    Kim BK; Bae HE; Shim JS; Lee KW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 16198173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surfaces.
    Trakyali G; Malkondu O; Kazazoğlu E; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):402-6. PubMed ID: 19339674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Arch GH; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.