BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

730 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20085642)

  • 1. Comparison of techniques for handling missing covariate data within prognostic modelling studies: a simulation study.
    Marshall A; Altman DG; Royston P; Holder RL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jan; 10():7. PubMed ID: 20085642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of imputation methods for handling missing covariate data when fitting a Cox proportional hazards model: a resampling study.
    Marshall A; Altman DG; Holder RL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Dec; 10():112. PubMed ID: 21194416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Approaches for missing covariate data in logistic regression with MNAR sensitivity analyses.
    Ward RC; Axon RN; Gebregziabher M
    Biom J; 2020 Jul; 62(4):1025-1037. PubMed ID: 31957905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of methods for handling missing data on immunohistochemical markers in survival analysis of breast cancer.
    Ali AM; Dawson SJ; Blows FM; Provenzano E; Ellis IO; Baglietto L; Huntsman D; Caldas C; Pharoah PD
    Br J Cancer; 2011 Feb; 104(4):693-9. PubMed ID: 21266980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?
    Mukaka M; White SA; Terlouw DJ; Mwapasa V; Kalilani-Phiri L; Faragher EB
    Trials; 2016 Jul; 17():341. PubMed ID: 27450066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imputation of missing covariate in randomized controlled trials with a continuous outcome: Scoping review and new results.
    Kayembe MT; Jolani S; Tan FES; van Breukelen GJP
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Nov; 19(6):840-860. PubMed ID: 32510791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian Latent Variable Selection Model for Nonignorable Missingness.
    Du H; Enders C; Keller BT; Bradbury TN; Karney BR
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):478-512. PubMed ID: 33529056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias and efficiency of multiple imputation compared with complete-case analysis for missing covariate values.
    White IR; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2920-31. PubMed ID: 20842622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors.
    Galimard JE; Chevret S; Curis E; Resche-Rigon M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):90. PubMed ID: 30170561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies.
    Huque MH; Carlin JB; Simpson JA; Lee KJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):168. PubMed ID: 30541455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal data in the presence of a time-varying covariate with a non-linear association with time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):114. PubMed ID: 28743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does pattern mixture modelling reduce bias due to informative attrition compared to fitting a mixed effects model to the available cases or data imputed using multiple imputation?: a simulation study.
    Welch CA; Sabia S; Brunner E; Kivimäki M; Shipley MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 30157752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analyses that use data from hierarchical studies: an application to cluster randomized trials.
    Gomes M; Díaz-Ordaz K; Grieve R; Kenward MG
    Med Decis Making; 2013 Nov; 33(8):1051-63. PubMed ID: 23913915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Imputation Strategies for Incomplete Longitudinal Data in Life-Course Epidemiology.
    Shaw C; Wu Y; Zimmerman SC; Hayes-Larson E; Belin TR; Power MC; Glymour MM; Mayeda ER
    Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Nov; 192(12):2075-2084. PubMed ID: 37338987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a weighting approach for performing sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation.
    Rezvan PH; White IR; Lee KJ; Carlin JB; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():83. PubMed ID: 26464305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple imputation in veterinary epidemiological studies: a case study and simulation.
    Dohoo IR; Nielsen CR; Emanuelson U
    Prev Vet Med; 2016 Jul; 129():35-47. PubMed ID: 27317321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imputation of Missing Covariates in Randomized Controlled Trials with Continuous Outcomes: Simple, Unbiased and Efficient Methods.
    Kayembe MT; Jolani S; Tan FES; van Breukelen GJP
    J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Sep; 32(5):717-739. PubMed ID: 35041565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Missing data in a multi-item instrument were best handled by multiple imputation at the item score level.
    Eekhout I; de Vet HC; Twisk JW; Brand JP; de Boer MR; Heymans MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 67(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 24291505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcome-sensitive multiple imputation: a simulation study.
    Kontopantelis E; White IR; Sperrin M; Buchan I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 28068910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Realistic Evaluation of Methods for Handling Missing Data When There is a Mixture of MCAR, MAR, and MNAR Mechanisms in the Same Dataset.
    Gomer B; Yuan KH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(5):988-1013. PubMed ID: 36599049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.