111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20087670)
1. Analyzing the fitch method for reconstructing ancestral states on ultrametric phylogenetic trees.
Zhang L; Shen J; Yang J; Li G
Bull Math Biol; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1760-82. PubMed ID: 20087670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the Accuracy of Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction for Ultrametric Trees with Parsimony.
Herbst L; Fischer M
Bull Math Biol; 2018 Apr; 80(4):864-879. PubMed ID: 29476399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis on the reconstruction accuracy of the Fitch method for inferring ancestral states.
Yang J; Li J; Dong L; Grünewald S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 12():18. PubMed ID: 21226965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A weighted least-squares approach for inferring phylogenies from incomplete distance matrices.
Makarenkov V; Lapointe FJ
Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 20(13):2113-21. PubMed ID: 15059836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximum parsimony on subsets of taxa.
Fischer M; Thatte BD
J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):290-3. PubMed ID: 19538973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies.
Pagel M; Meade A; Barker D
Syst Biol; 2004 Oct; 53(5):673-84. PubMed ID: 15545248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular clock fork phylogenies: closed form analytic maximum likelihood solutions.
Chor B; Snir S
Syst Biol; 2004 Dec; 53(6):963-7. PubMed ID: 15764563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating divergence times in large phylogenetic trees.
Britton T; Anderson CL; Jacquet D; Lundqvist S; Bremer K
Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 17886144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reconstructing the evolutionary history of polyploids from multilabeled trees.
Huber KT; Oxelman B; Lott M; Moulton V
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Sep; 23(9):1784-91. PubMed ID: 16798795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reconstructing phylogeny by quadratically approximated maximum likelihood.
Woodhams MD; Hendy MD
Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 20 Suppl 1():i348-54. PubMed ID: 15262819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the efficacy of continuous quantitative characters for reconstructing the phylogeny of a morphologically homogeneous spider taxon (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Antrodiaetidae, Antrodiaetus).
Hendrixson BE; Bond JE
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Oct; 53(1):300-13. PubMed ID: 19523525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions.
Liu L; Pearl DK
Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):504-14. PubMed ID: 17562474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mixed-up trees: the structure of phylogenetic mixtures.
Matsen FA; Mossel E; Steel M
Bull Math Biol; 2008 May; 70(4):1115-39. PubMed ID: 18175189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using models of nucleotide evolution to build phylogenetic trees.
Bos DH; Posada D
Dev Comp Immunol; 2005; 29(3):211-27. PubMed ID: 15572070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perfectly misleading distances from ternary characters.
Bandelt HJ; Fischer M
Syst Biol; 2008 Aug; 57(4):540-3. PubMed ID: 18629738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neighbor joining algorithms for inferring phylogenies via LCA distances.
Gronau I; Moran S
J Comput Biol; 2007; 14(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 17381342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The net of life: reconstructing the microbial phylogenetic network.
Kunin V; Goldovsky L; Darzentas N; Ouzounis CA
Genome Res; 2005 Jul; 15(7):954-9. PubMed ID: 15965028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods.
Huang H; He Q; Kubatko LS; Knowles LL
Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 59(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 20833951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
