These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20087690)

  • 41. Approaches in the risk assessment of genetically modified foods by the Hellenic Food Safety Authority.
    Varzakas TH; Chryssochoidis G; Argyropoulos D
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):530-42. PubMed ID: 17275157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Need for an "integrated safety assessment" of GMOs, linking food safety and environmental considerations.
    Haslberger AG
    J Agric Food Chem; 2006 May; 54(9):3173-80. PubMed ID: 16637668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Making the EU "risk window" transparent: the normative foundations of the environmental risk assessment of GMOs.
    Jensen KK; Gamborg C; Madsen KH; Jørgensen RB; von Krauss MK; Folker AP; Sandøe P
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2003; 2(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 15612414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Certain new plant breeding techniques and their marketability in the context of EU GMO legislation - recent developments.
    Zimny T; Sowa S; Tyczewska A; Twardowski T
    N Biotechnol; 2019 Jul; 51():49-56. PubMed ID: 30779963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Surveying selected European feed and livestock production chains for features enabling the case-specific post-market monitoring of livestock for intake and potential health impacts of animal feeds derived from genetically modified crops.
    Kleter G; McFarland S; Bach A; Bernabucci U; Bikker P; Busani L; Kok E; Kostov K; Nadal A; Pla M; Ronchi B; Terre M; Einspanier R
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Jul; 117():66-78. PubMed ID: 28993215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Response to issues on GM agriculture in Africa: Are transgenic crops safe?
    Adenle AA
    BMC Res Notes; 2011 Oct; 4():388. PubMed ID: 21981823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The politics and science behind GMO acceptance.
    Varzakas TH; Arvanitoyannis IS; Baltas H
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2007; 47(4):335-61. PubMed ID: 17457721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Environmental risk assessment for medicinal products containing genetically modified organisms.
    Anliker B; Longhurst S; Buchholz CJ
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2010 Jan; 53(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 19940966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Genetically modified organisms in the United States: implementation, concerns, and public perception.
    Oeschger MP; Silva CE
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():57-68. PubMed ID: 17522820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Impact of genetically modified organisms on aquatic environments: Review of available data for the risk assessment.
    Pott A; Otto M; Schulz R
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Sep; 635():687-698. PubMed ID: 29680759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Regulatory and associated political issues with respect to Bt transgenic maize in the European union.
    Saeglitz C; Bartsch D
    J Invertebr Pathol; 2003 Jun; 83(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 12788278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Europe should rethink its stance on GM crops.
    Heap B
    Nature; 2013 Jun; 498(7455):409. PubMed ID: 23803807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Uninformed and disinformed society and the GMO market.
    Twardowski T; Małyska A
    Trends Biotechnol; 2015 Jan; 33(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 25528967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. GM crop co-existence: a question of choice, not prejudice.
    Pearsall D
    GM Crops Food; 2013; 4(3):143-50. PubMed ID: 23988874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. JRC GMO-Matrix: a web application to support Genetically Modified Organisms detection strategies.
    Angers-Loustau A; Petrillo M; Bonfini L; Gatto F; Rosa S; Patak A; Kreysa J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):417. PubMed ID: 25547877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Public health issues related with the consumption of food obtained from genetically modified organisms.
    Paparini A; Romano-Spica V
    Biotechnol Annu Rev; 2004; 10():85-122. PubMed ID: 15504704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Exploitation of genetically modified inoculants for industrial ecology applications.
    Morrissey JP; Walsh UF; O'Donnell A; Moënne-Loccoz Y; O'Gara F
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2002 Aug; 81(1-4):599-606. PubMed ID: 12448755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The EU legislation on "GMOs" between nonsense and protectionism: An ongoing Schumpeterian chain of public choices.
    Tagliabue G
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):57-73. PubMed ID: 28001470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms.
    Garcia-Alonso M; Jacobs E; Raybould A; Nickson TE; Sowig P; Willekens H; Van der Kouwe P; Layton R; Amijee F; Fuentes AM; Tencalla F
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(2):57-65. PubMed ID: 17328852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Tempest in a tea pot: How did the public conversation on genetically modified crops drift so far from the facts?
    Goldstein DA
    J Med Toxicol; 2014 Jun; 10(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 24798648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.