256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20087842)
1. Meta-regression with partial information on summary trial or patient characteristics.
Hemming K; Hutton JL; Maguire MG; Marson AG
Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1312-24. PubMed ID: 20087842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A pseudo-Bayesian shrinkage approach to regression with missing covariates.
Zhang N; Little RJ
Biometrics; 2012 Sep; 68(3):933-42. PubMed ID: 22150765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients.
Higgins JP; Whitehead A; Turner RM; Omar RZ; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(15):2219-41. PubMed ID: 11468761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian analysis for generalized linear models with nonignorably missing covariates.
Huang L; Chen MH; Ibrahim JG
Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):767-80. PubMed ID: 16135028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data.
Mathew T; Nordström K
Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):271-87. PubMed ID: 20349448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pattern-mixture models for multivariate incomplete data with covariates.
Little RJ; Wang Y
Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):98-111. PubMed ID: 8934587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
Stijnen T; Hamza TH; Ozdemir P
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):3046-67. PubMed ID: 20827667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate.
Knapp G; Hartung J
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2693-710. PubMed ID: 12939780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regression analysis with missing covariate data using estimating equations.
Zhao LP; Lipsitz S; Lew D
Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1165-82. PubMed ID: 8962448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors.
Schmid CH; Stark PC; Berlin JA; Landais P; Lau J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 57(7):683-97. PubMed ID: 15358396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inference using conditional logistic regression with missing covariates.
Lipsitz SR; Parzen M; Ewell M
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):295-303. PubMed ID: 9544523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A local influence sensitivity analysis for incomplete longitudinal depression data.
Shen S; Beunckens C; Mallinckrodt C; Molenberghs G
J Biopharm Stat; 2006 May; 16(3):365-84. PubMed ID: 16724491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis.
Higgins JP; Whitehead A
Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2733-49. PubMed ID: 8981683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales.
Warn DE; Thompson SG; Spiegelhalter DJ
Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1601-23. PubMed ID: 12111922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error.
Wulfsohn MS; Tsiatis AA
Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):330-9. PubMed ID: 9147598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
Macaskill P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MMRM vs. LOCF: a comprehensive comparison based on simulation study and 25 NDA datasets.
Siddiqui O; Hung HM; O'Neill R
J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):227-46. PubMed ID: 19212876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
