BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20088397)

  • 1. [Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].
    Spaczyński M; Nowak-Markwitz E; Januszek-Michalecka L; Karowicz-Bilińska A
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):833-8. PubMed ID: 20088397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical cancer screening: who is not screened and why?
    Harlan LC; Bernstein AB; Kessler LG
    Am J Public Health; 1991 Jul; 81(7):885-90. PubMed ID: 2053665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preliminary results of a district call scheme for cervical screening organised in general practice.
    Havelock CM; Webb J; Queenborough J
    BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6660):1384-6. PubMed ID: 3146374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who has Pap tests? Variables associated with the use of Pap tests in absence of screening programmes.
    Ronco G; Segnan N; Ponti A
    Int J Epidemiol; 1991 Jun; 20(2):349-53. PubMed ID: 1917233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low knowledge of cervical cancer and cervical pap smears among women in Peru, and their ideas of how this could be improved.
    Paz-Soldán VA; Nussbaum L; Bayer AM; Cabrera L
    Int Q Community Health Educ; 2010-2011; 31(3):245-63. PubMed ID: 21988870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Who is getting Pap smears in urban Peru?
    Paz Soldan VA; Lee FH; Carcamo C; Holmes KK; Garnett GP; Garcia P
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 37(4):862-9. PubMed ID: 18653515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compliance behavior in women with abnormal Pap smears. Developing and testing a decision model.
    Paskett ED; Carter WB; Chu J; White E
    Med Care; 1990 Jul; 28(7):643-56. PubMed ID: 2366603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cross-sectional study to assess knowledge of women about cervical cancer: an urban and rural comparison.
    Lesińska-Sawicka M
    Environ Health Prev Med; 2021 Jun; 26(1):64. PubMed ID: 34098871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validating self-reported cervical cancer screening among women leaving jails.
    Webb S; Kelly PJ; Wickliffe J; Ault K; Ramaswamy M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219178. PubMed ID: 31260465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pap screening in Austria.
    Gerstner G; Gredler B
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1987; 14(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 3568398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-reported participation in cervical cancer screening among Polish women in 2004-2019.
    Michalek IM; Manczuk M; Caetano Dos Santos FL; Macios A; Didkowska J; Nowakowski A
    Ginekol Pol; 2024; 95(5):335-342. PubMed ID: 38099666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving adherence to screening follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears: results from a large clinic-based trial of three intervention strategies.
    Marcus AC; Crane LA; Kaplan CP; Reading AE; Savage E; Gunning J; Bernstein G; Berek JS
    Med Care; 1992 Mar; 30(3):216-30. PubMed ID: 1538610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increasing cervical screening in women of more than 40 years of age: an intervention in general practice.
    Cockburn J; Hirst S; Hill D; Marks R
    Med J Aust; 1990 Feb; 152(4):190-4. PubMed ID: 2300026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district.
    Beardow R; Oerton J; Victor C
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6691):98-100. PubMed ID: 2504348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.
    Chorley AJ; Marlow LA; Forster AS; Haddrell JB; Waller J
    Psychooncology; 2017 Feb; 26(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 27072589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pap screening goals and perceptions of pain among black, Latina, and Arab women: steps toward breaking down psychological barriers.
    Gauss JW; Mabiso A; Williams KP
    J Cancer Educ; 2013 Jun; 28(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 23288606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical cancer screening: a comparison of recruitment strategies among older women.
    Mitchell H; Hirst S; Cockburn J; Reading DJ; Staples MP; Medley G
    Med J Aust; 1991 Jul; 155(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 1857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing physicians' compliance with guidelines for Papanicolaou testing.
    Cohen MM; Roos NP; MacWilliam L; Wajda A
    Med Care; 1992 Jun; 30(6):514-28. PubMed ID: 1593917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Canada: national data from 1932 to 2006.
    Dickinson JA; Stankiewicz A; Popadiuk C; Pogany L; Onysko J; Miller AB
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Nov; 12():992. PubMed ID: 23158654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Organization of the screening programme in Bialystok Province.
    Kazanowska W; Knapp P
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1992; 13(1 Suppl):25-9. PubMed ID: 1511710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.