960 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20088397)
21. How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical cancer screening reason about their decision?
Blomberg K; Ternestedt BM; Törnberg S; Tishelman C
Psychooncology; 2008 Jun; 17(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 17886262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women.
Suarez L; Pulley L
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):41-7. PubMed ID: 8562221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Screening mammography in Polish female population aged 45 to 54].
Bińkowska M; Debski R
Ginekol Pol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):871-8. PubMed ID: 16566361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. How can young women be encouraged to attend cervical cancer screening? Suggestions from face-to-face and internet focus group discussions with 30-year-old women in Stockholm, Sweden.
Blomberg K; Tishelman C; Ternestedt BM; Törnberg S; Levál A; Widmark C
Acta Oncol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 21091087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Correlates of women's cancer screening and contraceptive knowledge among female emergency department patients.
Merchant RC; Gee EM; Bock BC; Becker BM; Clark MA
BMC Womens Health; 2007 May; 7():7. PubMed ID: 17519020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Knowledge, attitude and practice of the pap smear as a screening procedure among nurses in a tertiary hospital in north eastern India.
Thippeveeranna C; Mohan SS; Singh LR; Singh NN
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(2):849-52. PubMed ID: 23621250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Pap smear screening results between Akha hill tribe and urban women in Chiang Rai province, Thailand.
Kritpetcharat O; Wutichouy W; Sirijaichingkul S; Kritpetcharat P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(11):5501-4. PubMed ID: 23317207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Women at risk: papanicolaou smear screening in Florida.
Vincent AL; Greene JN; Hoercherl S; McTague D
J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(5):302-7. PubMed ID: 9260433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cervical cancer risk levels in Turkey and compliance to the national cervical cancer screening standard.
Açikgöz A; Ergör G
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):923-7. PubMed ID: 21790227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Health education to increase screening for cervical cancer among Lumbee Indian women in North Carolina.
Dignan MB; Michielutte R; Wells HB; Sharp P; Blinson K; Case LD; Bell R; Konen J; Davis S; McQuellon RP
Health Educ Res; 1998 Dec; 13(4):545-56. PubMed ID: 10345905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Factors associated with cervical cancer screening amongst women of reproductive age from Yucatan, Mexico.
Conde-Ferraez L; Suarez Allen RE; Carrillo Martinez JR; Ayora-Talavera G; Gonzalez-Losa Mdel R
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(9):4719-24. PubMed ID: 23167409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Effect of Education on the Early Diagnosis of Breast and Cervix Cancer on the Women's Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Participating in Screening Programs.
Kocaöz S; Özçelik H; Talas MS; Akkaya F; Özkul F; Kurtuluş A; Ünlü F
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):821-832. PubMed ID: 28285418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pap smear screening, pap smear abnormalities and psychosocial risk factors among women in a residential alcohol and drug rehabilitation facility.
Soccio J; Brown M; Comino E; Friesen E
J Adv Nurs; 2015 Dec; 71(12):2858-66. PubMed ID: 26279461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of family physicians on cervical cancer screening: cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey in a region of southern Poland.
Nessler K; Chan SKF; Ball F; Storman M; Chwalek M; Krztoń-Królewiecka A; Kryj-Radziszewska E; Windak A
BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e031317. PubMed ID: 31473624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Women's perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical screening: results from a population based study in India.
Basu P; Sarkar S; Mukherjee S; Ghoshal M; Mittal S; Biswas S; Mandal R; Sankaranarayanan R
Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 16963194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in women attending the Family Medical Program in Niterói, Rio de Janeiro.
Augusto EF; Rosa ML; Cavalcanti SM; Oliveira LH
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 22886356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Screening for breast and cervical cancer in a large German city: participation, motivation and knowledge of risk factors.
Klug SJ; Hetzer M; Blettner M
Eur J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 15(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 15788807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Empowerment beliefs and intention to uptake cervical cancer screening: three psychosocial mediating mechanisms.
Luszczynska A; Durawa AB; Scholz U; Knoll N
Women Health; 2012; 52(2):162-81. PubMed ID: 22458292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
