BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20088397)

  • 41. Cervical screening in an inner city area: response to a call system in general practice.
    Shroff KJ; Corrigan AM; Bosher M; Edmonds MP; Sacks D; Coleman DV
    BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6659):1317-8. PubMed ID: 3144375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists.
    Raginel T; Grandazzi G; Launoy G; Trocmé M; Christophe V; Berchi C; Guittet L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Jul; 20(1):693. PubMed ID: 32718319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cervical screening in Perth and Kinross since introduction of the new contract.
    Reid GS; Robertson AJ; Bissett C; Smith J; Waugh N; Halkerston R
    BMJ; 1991 Aug; 303(6800):447-50. PubMed ID: 1912838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Can health education increase uptake of cervical smear testing among Asian women?
    McAvoy BR; Raza R
    BMJ; 1991 Apr; 302(6780):833-6. PubMed ID: 1958248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Factors of importance for the use of PAP-SMEAR in a Danish county without systematic screening.
    Olesen F; Holm M
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 1990 Jul; 8(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 2218156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A feasibility study of organised cervical screening in southern New Zealand.
    Cox B; Skegg DC; Paul C; Smeijers J
    Aust J Public Health; 1991 Sep; 15(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 1932330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Knowledge and attitudes about cervical cancer and the Pap smear among 10th-grade girls.
    Sharp PC; Dignan MB; Dammers PM; Michielutte R; Jackson DS
    South Med J; 1990 Sep; 83(9):1016-8. PubMed ID: 2402642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Barriers to screening for cancer of the cervix.
    Peters RK; Bear MB; Thomas D
    Prev Med; 1989 Jan; 18(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 2710757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the Pap test among women in Northeastern Brazil.
    Albuquerque CL; Costa Mda P; Nunes FM; Freitas RW; Azevedo PR; Fernandes JV; Rego JV; Barreto HM
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2014; 132(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 24474073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening.
    Pierce M; Lundy S; Palanisamy A; Winning S; King J
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6692):160-2. PubMed ID: 2504359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Pap testing intervals. Specialty differences in physicians' recommendations in relation to women's pap testing behavior.
    Teitelbaum MA; Weisman CS; Klassen AC; Celentano D
    Med Care; 1988 Jun; 26(6):607-18. PubMed ID: 2837613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reminder letters for women when repeat Pap smears are due.
    Mitchell H
    Community Health Stud; 1990; 14(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 2208976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cervical cancer screening practices among older women: results from the Maryland Cervical Cancer Case-Control Study.
    Celentano DD; Klassen AC; Weisman CS; Rosenshein NB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1988; 41(6):531-41. PubMed ID: 3385455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A 'smear campaign' against patient-excluded policy changes: a reflection on the language used in cervical screening programmes.
    Morse IM; Amiry J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2024 Jun; 74(suppl 1):. PubMed ID: 38902077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reasons for non-attendance for computer-managed cervical screening: pilot interviews.
    Elkind AK; Haran D; Eardley A; Spencer B
    Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(6):651-60. PubMed ID: 3227371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A multifaceted intervention to increase cervical cancer screening among underserved Korean women.
    Fang CY; Ma GX; Tan Y; Chi N
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(6):1298-302. PubMed ID: 17548702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The prevalence of cervical cancer screening iin the United States in 1970.
    Rochat RW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jun; 125(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 984084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of a call programme for cervical cytology screening in women aged 50-60.
    Robertson AJ; Reid GS; Stoker CA; Bissett C; Waugh N; Fenton I; Rowan J; Halkerston R
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6692):163-6. PubMed ID: 2504360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Inner-city women at risk for cervical cancer: behavioral and utilization factors related to inadequate screening.
    Mamon JA; Shediac MC; Crosby CB; Sanders B; Matanoski GM; Celentano DD
    Prev Med; 1990 Jul; 19(4):363-76. PubMed ID: 2399220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. General practitioners and the provision of Papanicolaou smear-tests: current practice, knowledge and attitudes.
    Bowman JA; Redman S; Reid AL; Sanson-Fisher RW
    Med J Aust; 1990 Feb; 152(4):178-83. PubMed ID: 2300023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.