These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20088870)

  • 1. The mismeasurement of sexual selection.
    Klug H; Heuschele J; Jennions MD; Kokko H
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Mar; 23(3):447-62. PubMed ID: 20088870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Operational sex ratio and density do not affect directional selection on male sexual ornaments and behavior.
    Head ML; Lindholm AK; Brooks R
    Evolution; 2008 Jan; 62(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 18067568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.
    Kokko H; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):919-48. PubMed ID: 18462318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic versus census estimators of the opportunity for sexual selection in the wild.
    Dunn SJ; Waits LP; Byers JA
    Am Nat; 2012 Apr; 179(4):451-62. PubMed ID: 22437175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Operational sex ratio, sexual conflict and the intensity of sexual selection.
    Fitze PS; Le Galliard JF
    Ecol Lett; 2008 May; 11(5):432-9. PubMed ID: 18279355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection.
    Jennions MD; Kokko H; Klug H
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Mar; 25(3):591-8. PubMed ID: 22268720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences.
    Cotton S; Small J; Pomiankowski A
    Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(17):R755-65. PubMed ID: 16950102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of operational sex ratio on the intensity of competition for mates.
    Weir LK; Grant JW; Hutchings JA
    Am Nat; 2011 Feb; 177(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 21460553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual selection favors female-biased sex ratios: the balance between the opposing forces of sex-ratio selection and sexual selection.
    Wade MJ; Shuster SM; Demuth JP
    Am Nat; 2003 Oct; 162(4):403-14. PubMed ID: 14582004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mating system and demographic constraints on the opportunity for sexual selection.
    Wiegmann DD; Nguyen T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Feb; 69(1):34-47. PubMed ID: 16257429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An experimental test of the effects of resources and sex ratio on maternal fitness and phenotypic selection in gynodioecious Fragaria virginiana.
    Case AL; Ashman TL
    Evolution; 2007 Aug; 61(8):1900-11. PubMed ID: 17683432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operational sex ratio but not density affects sexual selection in a fish.
    Wacker S; Mobley K; Forsgren E; Myhre LC; de Jong K; Amundsen T
    Evolution; 2013 Jul; 67(7):1937-49. PubMed ID: 23815651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molecular parentage analysis in experimental newt populations: the response of mating system measures to variation in the operational sex ratio.
    Jones AG; Arguello JR; Arnold SJ
    Am Nat; 2004 Oct; 164(4):444-56. PubMed ID: 15459877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The opportunity for sexual selection: not mismeasured, just misunderstood.
    Krakauer AH; Webster MS; Duval EH; Jones AG; Shuster SM
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Sep; 24(9):2064-71. PubMed ID: 21635605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Operational sex ratio predicts the opportunity and direction of sexual selection across animals.
    Janicke T; Morrow EH
    Ecol Lett; 2018 Mar; 21(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 29341415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental evidence that sexual conflict influences the opportunity, form and intensity of sexual selection.
    Hall MD; Bussière LF; Hunt J; Brooks R
    Evolution; 2008 Sep; 62(9):2305-15. PubMed ID: 18540949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mate choice and the operational sex ratio: an experimental test with robotic crabs.
    Hayes CL; Callander S; Booksmythe I; Jennions MD; Backwell PR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1455-61. PubMed ID: 27087241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual selection when fertilization is not guaranteed.
    Kokko H; Mappes J
    Evolution; 2005 Sep; 59(9):1876-85. PubMed ID: 16261726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
    McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.