320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20089057)
1. Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials.
Pusman E; Cehreli ZC; Altay N; Unver B; Saracbasi O; Ozgun G
Dent Traumatol; 2010 Feb; 26(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 20089057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture strength of tooth fragment reattachments with postpone bevel and overcontour reconstruction.
Stellini E; Stomaci D; Stomaci M; Petrone N; Favero L
Dent Traumatol; 2008 Jun; 24(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 18489478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of techniques used for re-attachment of endodontically treated crown fractured teeth.
Loguercio AD; Leski G; Sossmeier D; Kraul A; Oda M; Patzlaff RT; Reis A
J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18308450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength.
Bruschi-Alonso RC; Alonso RC; Correr GM; Alves MC; Lewgoy HR; Sinhoreti MA; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L
Dent Traumatol; 2010 Aug; 26(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 20662884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of fractured or sectioned fragments on the fracture strength of different reattachment techniques.
Loguercio AD; Mengarda J; Amaral R; Kraul A; Reis A
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 15195730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reattachment of rehydrated dental fragment using two techniques.
Capp CI; Roda MI; Tamaki R; Castanho GM; Camargo MA; de Cara AA
Dent Traumatol; 2009 Feb; 25(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 19208019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different materials.
Reis A; Kraul A; Francci C; de Assis TG; Crivelli DD; Oda M; Loguercio AD
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):621-7. PubMed ID: 12413229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques.
Reis A; Francci C; Loguercio AD; Carrilho MR; Rodriques Filho LE
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 11357572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reattachment of fractured anterior teeth-determining fracture strength using different techniques: an in vitro study.
Srilatha ; Joshi S; Chhasatia N; Rani PJ; Mathur E
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 22430695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shear bond strength of restorations applied to un-complicated crown fractures: an in vitro study.
Pamir T; Eden E; Sebahtin Ahmed S
Dent Traumatol; 2012 Apr; 28(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 22051058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of reattached incisor fragments with mini fibre-reinforced composite anchors.
Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Wolke JG; Fokkinga WA; Machado C; Creugers NH
J Dent; 2009 Jun; 37(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 19339099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incisal edge reattachment: the effect of preparation utilization and design.
Worthington RB; Murchison DF; Vandewalle KS
Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):637-43. PubMed ID: 10765871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bonding to worn or fractured incisal edges: shear bond strength of new adhesive systems.
Goracci C; Bertelli E; Ferrari M
Quintessence Int; 2004 Jan; 35(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 14765637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adhesive reattachment of a tooth fragment: the biological restoration.
Terry DA
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003 Jun; 15(5):403-9; quiz 410. PubMed ID: 12901070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of various materials and tooth preparation designs used for reattachment of fractured incisors.
Bhargava M; Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M
Dent Traumatol; 2010 Oct; 26(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 20831637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
Ozturk N; Aykent F
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of reattached incisal fragments using different materials and techniques.
Chazine M; Sedda M; Ounsi HF; Paragliola R; Ferrari M; Grandini S
Dent Traumatol; 2011 Feb; 27(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 21244624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
