These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20089512)

  • 1. Field tests using radioactive matter.
    Prouza Z; Beckova V; Cespirova I; Helebrant J; Hulka J; Kuca P; Michalek V; Rulik P; Skrkal J; Hovorka J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 139(4):519-31. PubMed ID: 20089512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of health hazards resulting from a radiological terrorist attack in a city.
    Andersson KG; Mikkelsen T; Astrup P; Thykier-Nielsen S; Jacobsen LH; Schou-Jensen L; Hoe SC; Nielsen SP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 18550515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Field tests using radioactive matter 2.
    Rulik P; Prouza Z; Hovorka J; Beckova V; Cespirova I; Fronka A; Helebrant J; Hulka J; Kuca P; Skrkal J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Apr; 154(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 22923250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numerical system utilising a Monte Carlo calculation method for accurate dose assessment in radiation accidents.
    Takahashi F; Endo A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):595-9. PubMed ID: 17510203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Requirements for estimation of doses from contaminants dispersed by a 'dirty bomb' explosion in an urban area.
    Andersson KG; Mikkelsen T; Astrup P; Thykier-Nielsen S; Jacobsen LH; Hoe SC; Nielsen SP
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1005-11. PubMed ID: 19427717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Key sources of imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments.
    Haywood SM
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 18495989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Austria-Czech Republic co-operation in the field of radiation-emergency preparedness.
    Prouza Z; Drabova D; Moltasova J; Hohenberg JK; Hofer P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):105-10. PubMed ID: 15238666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test case of the long term preliminary performance assessment for the L&IL radioactive waste repository Baita Bihor, Romania.
    Ene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):433-6. PubMed ID: 16403732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation of atmospheric dispersion of radionuclides using an Eulerian-Lagrangian modelling system.
    Basit A; Espinosa F; Avila R; Raza S; Irfan N
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Dec; 28(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 19029589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of the uncertainty in internal dose calculation for two contamination cases.
    Blanchardon E; Molokanov A; Franck D; Kochetkov O; Panfilov A; Jourdain JR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):548-52. PubMed ID: 17237182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neutron scattering in concrete and wood.
    Facure A; Silva AX; Falcão RC; Crispim VR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):514-7. PubMed ID: 16565202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kalman filtration of radiation monitoring data from atmospheric dispersion of radioactive materials.
    Drews M; Lauritzen B; Madsen H; Smith JQ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 15266085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of a Kalman filter based method for on-line estimation of atmospheric dispersion parameters using radiation monitoring data.
    Drews M; Lauritzen B; Madsen H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 15572402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose rate calculations for a reconnaissance vehicle.
    Grindrod L; Mackey J; Salmon M; Smith C; Wall S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):420-3. PubMed ID: 16381759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the toxicity of buried radioactive waste.
    Cohen BL
    Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):394-6. PubMed ID: 16966886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach.
    Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J
    Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. External dosimetry in the aftermath of a radiological terrorist event.
    Klemic GA; Bailey PD; Miller KM; Monetti MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):242-9. PubMed ID: 16606662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment for soil samples from Kestanbol granite area, Turkey.
    Merdanoğlu B; Altinsoy N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 16698965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A fast and simple approach for the estimation of a radiological source from localised measurements after the explosion of a radiological dispersal device.
    Urso L; Kaiser JC; Woda C; Helebrant J; Hulka J; Kuca P; Prouza Z
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 24214910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.