214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2009058)
1. Narrow excision (1-cm margin). A safe procedure for thin cutaneous melanoma.
Veronesi U; Cascinelli N
Arch Surg; 1991 Apr; 126(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 2009058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thin stage I primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. Comparison of excision with margins of 1 or 3 cm.
Veronesi U; Cascinelli N; Adamus J; Balch C; Bandiera D; Barchuk A; Bufalino R; Craig P; De Marsillac J; Durand JC
N Engl J Med; 1988 May; 318(18):1159-62. PubMed ID: 3079582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wide versus narrow excision margins for high-risk, primary cutaneous melanomas: long-term follow-up of survival in a randomised trial.
Hayes AJ; Maynard L; Coombes G; Newton-Bishop J; Timmons M; Cook M; Theaker J; Bliss JM; Thomas JM; ; ;
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Feb; 17(2):184-192. PubMed ID: 26790922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Haigh PI; DiFronzo LA; McCready DR
Can J Surg; 2003 Dec; 46(6):419-26. PubMed ID: 14680348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Narrow versus wide margins in malignant melanoma.
Rogers GS
J Dermatol Surg Oncol; 1989 Jan; 15(1):33-4. PubMed ID: 2910963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term results of a prospective surgical trial comparing 2 cm vs. 4 cm excision margins for 740 patients with 1-4 mm melanomas.
Balch CM; Soong SJ; Smith T; Ross MI; Urist MM; Karakousis CP; Temple WJ; Mihm MC; Barnhill RL; Jewell WR; Wanebo HJ; Desmond R;
Ann Surg Oncol; 2001 Mar; 8(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 11258773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Excision margins in high-risk malignant melanoma.
Thomas JM; Newton-Bishop J; A'Hern R; Coombes G; Timmons M; Evans J; Cook M; Theaker J; Fallowfield M; O'Neill T; Ruka W; Bliss JM; ; ;
N Engl J Med; 2004 Feb; 350(8):757-66. PubMed ID: 14973217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous melanoma.
Zitelli JA; Brown CD; Hanusa BH
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1997 Sep; 37(3 Pt 1):422-9. PubMed ID: 9308558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum Safe Pathologic Excision Margins for Primary Cutaneous Melanomas (1-2 mm in Thickness): Analysis of 2131 Patients Treated at a Single Center.
Haydu LE; Stollman JT; Scolyer RA; Spillane AJ; Quinn MJ; Saw RP; Shannon KF; Stretch JR; Bonenkamp JJ; Thompson JF
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):1071-81. PubMed ID: 25956574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 2-cm versus 4-cm surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma thicker than 2 mm: long-term follow-up of a multicentre, randomised trial.
Utjés D; Malmstedt J; Teras J; Drzewiecki K; Gullestad HP; Ingvar C; Eriksson H; Gillgren P
Lancet; 2019 Aug; 394(10197):471-477. PubMed ID: 31280965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A retrospective study of 1- versus 2-cm excision margins for cutaneous malignant melanomas thicker than 2 mm.
Hunger RE; Angermeier S; Seyed Jafari SM; Ochsenbein A; Shafighi M
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2015 Jun; 72(6):1054-9. PubMed ID: 25877659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Margins of excision for cutaneous melanoma of the eyelid skin: the Collaborative Eyelid Skin Melanoma Group Report.
Esmaeli B; Youssef A; Naderi A; Ahmadi MA; Meyer DR; McNab A;
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 19(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 12644753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective observational study of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma patients treated with excision only compared with excision biopsy followed by wider local excision.
McKenna DB; Lee RJ; Prescott RJ; Doherty VR
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Mar; 150(3):523-30. PubMed ID: 15030337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local recurrence in malignant melanoma: long-term results of the multiinstitutional randomized surgical trial.
Karakousis CP; Balch CM; Urist MM; Ross MM; Smith TJ; Bartolucci AA
Ann Surg Oncol; 1996 Sep; 3(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 8876886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Excision margins in the treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing narrow vs wide excision.
Lens MB; Dawes M; Goodacre T; Bishop JA
Arch Surg; 2002 Oct; 137(10):1101-5. PubMed ID: 12361412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Margin of resection in the management of primary melanoma.
Cascinelli N
Semin Surg Oncol; 1998 Jun; 14(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 9588719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Resection margins of 2 versus 5 cm for cutaneous malignant melanoma with a tumor thickness of 0.8 to 2.0 mm: randomized study by the Swedish Melanoma Study Group.
Ringborg U; Andersson R; Eldh J; Glaumann B; Hafström L; Jacobsson S; Jönsson PE; Johansson H; Krysander L; Lagerlöf B
Cancer; 1996 May; 77(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 8646678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 2-cm versus 4-cm surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma thicker than 2 mm: a randomised, multicentre trial.
Gillgren P; Drzewiecki KT; Niin M; Gullestad HP; Hellborg H; Månsson-Brahme E; Ingvar C; Ringborg U
Lancet; 2011 Nov; 378(9803):1635-42. PubMed ID: 22027547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One-cm Versus 2-cm Excision Margins for Patients With Intermediate Thickness Melanoma: A Matched-Pair Analysis.
Koskivuo I; Giordano S; Veräjänkorva E; Vihinen P
Dermatol Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1130-6. PubMed ID: 26356846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histopathologic excision margin affects local recurrence rate: analysis of 2681 patients with melanomas < or =2 mm thick.
McKinnon JG; Starritt EC; Scolyer RA; McCarthy WH; Thompson JF
Ann Surg; 2005 Feb; 241(2):326-33. PubMed ID: 15650644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
