These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2009065)

  • 1. Touch preparation cytology of breast lumpectomy margins with histologic correlation.
    Cox CE; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HM; Nicosia SV; Wangensteen S
    Arch Surg; 1991 Apr; 126(4):490-3. PubMed ID: 2009065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cytology of lumpectomy specimens.
    Ku NN; Cox CE; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HM; Nicosia SV
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 1718113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determinants of positive histologic margins and residual tumor after lumpectomy for early breast cancer: a prospective study with special reference to touch preparation cytology.
    Saarela AO; Paloneva TK; Rissanen TJ; Kiviniemi HO
    J Surg Oncol; 1997 Dec; 66(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 9425328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients.
    Bakhshandeh M; Tutuncuoglu SO; Fischer G; Masood S
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):656-9. PubMed ID: 17854083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins.
    Cox CE; Pendas S; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HS; Nicosia SV
    Am Surg; 1998 Jun; 64(6):533-7; discussion 537-8. PubMed ID: 9619174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraoperative evaluation of lumpectomy margins by imprint cytology with histologic correlation: a community hospital experience.
    Creager AJ; Shaw JA; Young PR; Geisinger KR
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2002 Jul; 126(7):846-8. PubMed ID: 12088456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis of lumpectomy margins during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.
    Osako T; Nishimura R; Nishiyama Y; Okumura Y; Tashima R; Nakano M; Fujisue M; Toyozumi Y; Arima N
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Dec; 20(6):1093-101. PubMed ID: 25855313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions.
    Sauter ER; Hoffman JP; Ottery FD; Kowalyshyn MJ; Litwin S; Eisenberg BL
    Cancer; 1994 May; 73(10):2607-12. PubMed ID: 8174059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
    Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
    Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of touch imprint cytology and frozen section techniques in detecting breast malignancies.
    Ahmed S; Ahmad M
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Mar; 66(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 26968279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery.
    Weber S; Storm FK; Stitt J; Mahvi DM
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 9327150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a series of 400 procedures.
    D'Halluin F; Tas P; Rouquette S; Bendavid C; Foucher F; Meshba H; Blanchot J; Coué O; Levêque J
    Breast; 2009 Aug; 18(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 19515566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Local recurrence in lumpectomy patients after imprint cytology margin evaluation.
    Weinberg E; Cox C; Dupont E; White L; Ebert M; Greenberg H; Diaz N; Vercel V; Centeno B; Cantor A; Nicosia S
    Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15474425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Touch-preparation cytologic examination of breast core biopsy specimens: accuracy in predicting benign or malignant core histologic results.
    March DE; Walker MT; Bur M; Coughlin BF; Dziura B; Lorenzana RR; Makari-Judson G
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Jun; 6(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 10376063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance.
    Camp ER; McAuliffe PF; Gilroy JS; Morris CG; Lind DS; Mendenhall NP; Copeland EM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Dec; 201(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16310688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scrape cytology assessment of margins of lumpectomy specimens in breast cancer.
    Gal R
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):838-9. PubMed ID: 3059734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interoperative frozen section for margin assessment in breast conserving energy.
    Dener C; Inan A; Sen M; Demirci S
    Scand J Surg; 2009; 98(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19459270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma.
    Scopa CD; Aroukatos P; Tsamandas AC; Aletra C
    Breast J; 2006; 12(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 16509840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.