These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20092094)

  • 21. Predicting the yield of the proximal femur using high-order finite-element analysis with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties.
    Yosibash Z; Tal D; Trabelsi N
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2010 Jun; 368(1920):2707-23. PubMed ID: 20439270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prediction of structural failure of tibial bone models under physiological loads: effect of CT density-modulus relationships.
    Tuncer M; Hansen UN; Amis AA
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Aug; 36(8):991-7; discussion 991. PubMed ID: 24907128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An analytical approach to investigate the evolution of bone volume fraction in bone remodeling simulation at the tissue and cell level.
    Colloca M; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Mar; 136(3):031004. PubMed ID: 24337166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro.
    Schileo E; Taddei F; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(2):356-67. PubMed ID: 18022179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Finite element modeling of the influence of hand position and bone properties on the Colles' fracture load during a fall.
    Buchanan D; Ural A
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Aug; 132(8):081007. PubMed ID: 20670056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of a customized density-modulus relationship for use in subject-specific finite element models of the ulna.
    Austman RL; Milner JS; Holdsworth DW; Dunning CE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Aug; 223(6):787-94. PubMed ID: 19743644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Contribution to the study of pelvic stress during weight-bearing. Role of the pubic branch and trabecular bone].
    Fabeck L; Descamps PY; Bourgois R; Dhem A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1994; 80(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 7899636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A subject-specific pelvic bone model and its application to cemented acetabular replacements.
    Zhang QH; Wang JY; Lupton C; Heaton-Adegbile P; Guo ZX; Liu Q; Tong J
    J Biomech; 2010 Oct; 43(14):2722-7. PubMed ID: 20655051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finite element analysis of acetabular fractures--development and validation with a synthetic pelvis.
    Shim V; Böhme J; Vaitl P; Klima S; Josten C; Anderson I
    J Biomech; 2010 May; 43(8):1635-9. PubMed ID: 20381049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation.
    Bourne BC; van der Meulen MC
    J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 15046990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development of a strain rate dependent material model of human cortical bone for computer-aided reconstruction of injury mechanisms.
    Asgharpour Z; Zioupos P; Graw M; Peldschus S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Mar; 236():109-16. PubMed ID: 24529781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Numerical simulations of the 3D virtual model of the human hip joint, using finite element method.
    Grecu D; Pucalev I; Negru M; Tarniţă DN; Ionovici N; Diţă R
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2010; 51(1):151-5. PubMed ID: 20191136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of bone strength by μCT and MDCT-based finite-element-models: how much spatial resolution is needed?
    Bauer JS; Sidorenko I; Mueller D; Baum T; Issever AS; Eckstein F; Rummeny EJ; Link TM; Raeth CW
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e36-42. PubMed ID: 24274992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomechanical analysis of supra-acetabular insufficiency fracture using finite element analysis.
    Tanaka H; Yamako G; Kurishima H; Yamashita S; Mori Y; Chiba D; Chosa E; Itoi E
    J Orthop Sci; 2018 Sep; 23(5):825-833. PubMed ID: 29866524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Basic considerations for determining the amount of press fit in acetabular cup endoprostheses as a function of the elastic bone behavior.
    Winter W; Karl M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2014 Oct; 59(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 24937501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments.
    Yosibash Z; Padan R; Joskowicz L; Milgrom C
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Jun; 129(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 17536896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simulation of creep in non-homogenous samples of human cortical bone.
    Ertas AH; Winwood K; Zioupos P; Cotton JR
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(10):1121-8. PubMed ID: 21574078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.