121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20092133)
1. Florida ranks 2nd nationally for C-sections.
Gilkey L
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2009-2010 Winter; (92):6. PubMed ID: 20092133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia.
Robson SJ; Tan WS; Adeyemi A; Dear KB
Birth; 2009 Sep; 36(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 19747267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should pregnant women be able to choose elective cesarean as a birth option?
Klein VR; McDowl J
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2010; 35(5):252-3. PubMed ID: 20706094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Disciplinary discourses: rates of cesarean section explained by medicine, midwifery, and feminism.
Lee AS; Kirkman M
Health Care Women Int; 2008 May; 29(5):448-67. PubMed ID: 18437594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The boom in unnecessary caesarean surgeries is jeopardizing women's health.
Ajeet S; Nandkishore K
Health Care Women Int; 2013; 34(6):513-21. PubMed ID: 23477588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How much influence do women in Sweden have on caesarean section? A follow-up study of women's preferences in early pregnancy.
Hildingsson I
Midwifery; 2008 Mar; 24(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 17197058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature.
McCourt C; Weaver J; Statham H; Beake S; Gamble J; Creedy DK
Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 17324181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconsideration of the costs of convenience: quality, operational, and fiscal strategies to minimize elective labor induction.
Simpson KR
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2010; 24(1):43-52; quiz 53-4. PubMed ID: 20147829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Satisfaction with cesarean section: qualitative analysis of open-ended questions in a large postal survey.
Porter M; van Teijlingen E; Chi Ying Yip L; Bhattacharya S
Birth; 2007 Jun; 34(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 17542819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risks and benefits of caesarean delivery on maternal request.
Midwifery; 2006 Jun; 22(2):98-9. PubMed ID: 16832891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health consequences of the increasing caesarean section rates.
Belizán JM; Althabe F; Cafferata ML
Epidemiology; 2007 Jul; 18(4):485-6. PubMed ID: 17568221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Studies spotlight concerns about caesarean section rates.
Pract Midwife; 2014 Jan; 17(1):6. PubMed ID: 24520584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Documented causes of unneCesareans.
Cohain JS
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2009-2010 Winter; (92):18-9, 63. PubMed ID: 20092138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Elective cesarean section during delivery and emergency. Interrelations among different indicators].
Lazarov L; Todorov I
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2000; 40(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 11288624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medically unnecessary Cesarean section. If it's unnecessary, why is it still performed?
Catalinotto E
Am J Nurs; 2007 Jul; 107(7):13. PubMed ID: 17589209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The implications of objectification theory for women's health: menstrual suppression and "maternal request" cesarean delivery.
Andrist LC
Health Care Women Int; 2008 May; 29(5):551-65. PubMed ID: 18437600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increasing evidence of negative impacts of caesareans say midwives.
Pract Midwife; 2014 Apr; 17(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 24804414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Elective caesarean section as a transformative technological process: players, power and context.
Hewer N; Boschma G; Hall WA
J Adv Nurs; 2009 Aug; 65(8):1762-71. PubMed ID: 19493142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis.
Chaillet N; Dumont A
Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 17324180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
