430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20092173)
1. Breast MRI: opportunities and challenges.
Day D
Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):45-8. PubMed ID: 20092173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast magnetic resonance image screening and ductal lavage in women at high genetic risk for breast carcinoma.
Hartman AR; Daniel BL; Kurian AW; Mills MA; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Kingham KE; Chun NM; Herfkens RJ; Ford JM; Plevritis SK
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(3):479-89. PubMed ID: 14745863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative locoregional staging.
Hollingsworth AB; Stough RG; O'Dell CA; Brekke CE
Am J Surg; 2008 Sep; 196(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18436185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA;
Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perspectives on preoperative staging with breast MRI.
Hollingsworth AB
J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Jul; 199(1):173-4. PubMed ID: 15217651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI of the breast as part of the assessment in population-based mammography screening.
Bick U; Engelken F; Diederichs G; Dzyuballa R; Ortmann M; Fallenberg EM
Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):849-56. PubMed ID: 23740312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Muller SH; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG;
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2318-26. PubMed ID: 16615112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Tan LK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):901-10. PubMed ID: 12646427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Consensus Meeting of Course Directors in Breast Imaging, 9 May 2009, in Frankfurt am Main - Topic: Masses].
Müller-Schimpfle MP; Heindel W; Kettritz U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bick U
Rofo; 2010 Aug; 182(8):671-5. PubMed ID: 20544579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI screening in a clinic population with a family history of breast cancer.
Yu J; Park A; Morris E; Liberman L; Borgen PI; King TA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):452-61. PubMed ID: 18026801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient age and preoperative breast MRI in women with breast cancer: biopsy and surgical implications.
Adkisson CD; Vallow LA; Kowalchik K; McNeil R; Hines S; Deperi E; Moreno A; Roy V; Perez EA; McLaughlin SA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Jun; 18(6):1678-83. PubMed ID: 21207171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Whole-body MRI in preoperative diagnostics of breast cancer--a comparison with [corrected] staging methods according to the S 3 guidelines].
Hausmann D; Kern C; Schröder MT; Sütterlin M; Schönberg SO; Neff KW; Dinter DJ
Rofo; 2011 Dec; 183(12):1130-7. PubMed ID: 22068844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Classification system for identifying women at risk for altered partial breast irradiation recommendations after breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Kowalchik KV; Vallow LA; McDonough M; Thomas CS; Heckman MG; Peterson JL; Adkisson CD; Serago C; McLaughlin SA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Sep; 87(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 23920391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can magnetic resonance imaging be used to select patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy in prophylactic mastectomy?
McLaughlin SA; Stempel M; Morris EA; Liberman L; King TA
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(6):1214-21. PubMed ID: 18257089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of preoperative breast MRIs on timing of surgery and type of intervention in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.
Angarita FA; Acuna SA; Fonseca A; Crystal P; Escallon J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 3():273-9. PubMed ID: 20853046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia.
Port ER; Park A; Borgen PI; Morris E; Montgomery LL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1051-7. PubMed ID: 17206485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of screening with annual magnetic resonance imaging and mammography: results of the initial screen from the ontario high risk breast screening program.
Chiarelli AM; Prummel MV; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Horgan M; Carroll JC; Eisen A; Meschino WS; Shumak RS; Warner E; Rabeneck L
J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jul; 32(21):2224-30. PubMed ID: 24934793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Camara O; Pfleiderer SO; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 21318935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
