396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20092595)
1. Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls.
Wyness T; McGhee CNj; Patel DV
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 37(9):864-7. PubMed ID: 20092595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts.
Silberzweig JE; Khorsandi AS
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1620-3. PubMed ID: 18693043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache.
Hesterman CM; Szperka CL; Turner DP
Headache; 2018 Nov; 58(10):1511-1518. PubMed ID: 30011058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acceptance rate and reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound during 2012.
Lamb CR; Mai W
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 24798652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What happens to medical articles submitted in Spanish that are not accepted for publication?
Matías-Guiu JA; García-Ramos R; Castellanos M; Martínez-Vila E; Matías-Guiu J
Neurologia; 2013 May; 28(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 22795919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
Lamb CR; Adams CA
Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The fate of triaged and rejected manuscripts.
Zoccali C; Amodeo D; Argiles A; Arici M; D'arrigo G; Evenepoel P; Fliser D; Fox J; Gesualdo L; Jadoul M; Ketteler M; Malyszko J; Massy Z; Mayer G; Ortiz A; Sever M; Vanholder R; Vinck C; Wanner C; Więcek A
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Dec; 30(12):1947-50. PubMed ID: 26597920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
Cejas C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review is an effective screening process to evaluate medical manuscripts.
Abby M; Massey MD; Galandiuk S; Polk HC
JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 8015116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fate of manuscripts rejected from the Red Journal.
Holliday EB; Yang G; Jagsi R; Hoffman KE; Bennett KE; Grace C; Zietman AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 25835616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
Enquselassie F
Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal.
Turcotte C; Drolet P; Girard M
Can J Anaesth; 2004; 51(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 15197116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of masking manuscripts for the peer-review process of an ophthalmic journal.
Isenberg SJ; Sanchez E; Zafran KC
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 93(7):881-4. PubMed ID: 19211602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study.
Alam M; Kim NA; Havey J; Rademaker A; Ratner D; Tregre B; West DP; Coleman WP
Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to AJR by international authors.
Ehara S; Takahashi K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):W113-6. PubMed ID: 17242215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fate of manuscripts declined by the British Journal of Surgery.
Wijnhoven BP; Dejong CH
Br J Surg; 2010 Mar; 97(3):450-4. PubMed ID: 20099256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals.
Chen H; Chen CH; Jhanji V
Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23623355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
