These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20092630)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation.
    Tan JM; Macario A; Carvalho B; Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2010 Jan; 10():3. PubMed ID: 20092630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation of the external cephalic version in breech delivery. Dutch national implementation study of external cephalic version.
    Vlemmix F; Rosman AN; Fleuren MA; Rijnders ME; Beuckens A; Haak MC; Akerboom BM; Bais JM; Kuppens SM; Papatsonis DN; Opmeer BC; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2010 May; 10():20. PubMed ID: 20459717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A decision analytical cost analysis of offering ECV in a UK district general hospital.
    James M; Hunt K; Burr R; Johanson R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2001; 1():6. PubMed ID: 11472641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - External Cephalic Version and other Interventions to turn Breech Babies to Cephalic Presentation].
    Ducarme G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 31678503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association between hospitals' cesarean delivery rates for breech presentation and their success rates for external cephalic version.
    Athiel Y; Girault A; Le Ray C; Goffinet F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Mar; 270():156-163. PubMed ID: 35063899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.
    de Gregorio N; Friedl T; Schramm A; Reister F; Janni W; Ebner F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(5):477-481. PubMed ID: 28848185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brief report: a cost analysis of neuraxial anesthesia to facilitate external cephalic version for breech fetal presentation.
    Carvalho B; Tan JM; Macario A; El-Sayed YY; Sultan P
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Jul; 117(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 23592608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Impact of the external cephalic version on the obstetrical prognosis in a team with a high success rate of vaginal delivery in breech presentation].
    Coppola C; Mottet N; Mariet AS; Baeza C; Poitrey E; Bourtembourg A; Ramanah R; Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Oct; 45(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 27125381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of a second external cephalic version (ECV) after a successful first external cephalic version with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study.
    Reicher L; Lavie A; Fouks Y; Isakov O; Attali E; Yogev Y; Maslovitz S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):911-916. PubMed ID: 33025088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after previous cesarean.
    Chung A; Macario A; El-Sayed YY; Riley ET; Duncan B; Druzin ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 97(6):932-41. PubMed ID: 11384699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls.
    Balayla J; Dahdouh EM; Villeneuve S; Boucher M; Gauthier RJ; Audibert F; Fuchs F
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 24853490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.
    Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Ford JB
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 28747173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Matched cohort study of external cephalic version in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Keepanasseril A; Anand K; Soundara Raghavan S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jul; 138(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 28380246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining cost savings from attempted cephalic version in an inner city delivering population.
    Adams EK; Mauldin PD; Mauldin JG; Mayberry RM
    Health Care Manag Sci; 2000 Jun; 3(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 10907321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. External cephalic version of the non-cephalic presenting twin: a systematic review.
    Felder L; McCurdy R; Berghella V
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 May; 35(9):1712-1718. PubMed ID: 32434414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors associated with intrapartum cesarean section after a successful external cephalic version.
    Palepu PM; Anand K; Ghosh SK; Keepanasseril A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):9038-9042. PubMed ID: 34882048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delivery outcomes in subsequent pregnancy following primary breech cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.
    Eden-Friedman Y; Ginosar Y; Sela HY; Calderon-Margalit R; Eventov-Friedman S; Ezra Y; Weiniger CF
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 May; 33(9):1554-1560. PubMed ID: 30207183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Short Text].
    Sentilhes L; Schmitz T; Azria E; Gallot D; Ducarme G; Korb D; Mattuizzi A; Parant O; Sananès N; Baumann S; Rozenberg P; Senat MV; Verspyck É
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 31678505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of Canadian practitioners.
    Hutton EK; Hannah ME; Barrett J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Oct; 24(10):804-10. PubMed ID: 12399807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of breech version by acupuncture-type interventions on BL 67, including moxibustion, for women with a breech foetus at 33 weeks gestation: a modelling approach.
    van den Berg I; Kaandorp GC; Bosch JL; Duvekot JJ; Arends LR; Hunink MG
    Complement Ther Med; 2010 Apr; 18(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 20430289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.