These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20093174)

  • 21. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
    Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of temporal and spectral alterations of speech feedback on speech production by persons with hearing loss.
    Barac-Cikoja D
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 15148183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.
    Mattys SL; Brooks J; Cooke M
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Nov; 59(3):203-43. PubMed ID: 19423089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
    Feng Y; Yin S; Kiefte M; Wang J
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimation of vowel recognition with cochlear implant simulations.
    Liu C; Fu QJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17260858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): speech intelligibility in noise.
    Rao MD; Letowski T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 16518140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of spectral smearing on the identification of speech in noise filtered into low- and mid-frequency regions.
    Léger AC; Moore BC; Gnansia D; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4114-23. PubMed ID: 22559383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Harvey LO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1150-64. PubMed ID: 17672661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cantonese tone recognition with enhanced temporal periodicity cues.
    Yuan M; Lee T; Yuen KC; Soli SD; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):327-37. PubMed ID: 19603889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Female voice communications in high level aircraft cockpit noises--part II: vocoder and automatic speech recognition systems.
    Nixon C; Anderson T; Morris L; McCavitt A; McKinley R; Yeager D; McDaniel M
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1087-94. PubMed ID: 9819167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of temporal smearing on temporal resolution, frequency selectivity, and speech intelligibility.
    Hou Z; Pavlovic CV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1325-40. PubMed ID: 7962999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech fine structure contains critical temporal cues to support speech segmentation.
    Teng X; Cogan GB; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 202():116152. PubMed ID: 31484039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Changing only the probability that spoken words will be distorted changes how they are recognized.
    McQueen JM; Huettig F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):509-17. PubMed ID: 22280612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multiplicative effects on sentence comprehension for combined acoustic distortions.
    Lacroix PG; Harris JD; Randolph KJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Jun; 22(2):259-69. PubMed ID: 491554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition.
    Boothroyd A; Mulhearn B; Gong J; Ostroff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1807-18. PubMed ID: 8817914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues.
    Shannon RV; Zeng FG; Wygonski J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2467-76. PubMed ID: 10491708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Objective evaluation of speech signal quality by the prediction of multiple foreground diagnostic acceptability measure attributes.
    Sen D; Lu W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4087-103. PubMed ID: 22559381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.