These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20093305)

  • 1. Forest plots in reports of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study reviewing current practice.
    Schriger DL; Altman DG; Vetter JA; Heafner T; Moher D
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 39(2):421-9. PubMed ID: 20093305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the new age of transparency.
    Honig PK
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Aug; 88(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 20648031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews.
    Bender R; Bunce C; Clarke M; Gates S; Lange S; Pace NL; Thorlund K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 18687287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
    Watine J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 15563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study.
    Tricco AC; Tetzlaff J; Pham B; Brehaut J; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):380-386.e1. PubMed ID: 19128940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Schlesselman JJ; Collins JA
    Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 12806564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses "For Dummies".
    Biondi-Zoccai GG; Abbate A; Sheiban I
    EuroIntervention; 2009 Aug; 5(3):289-91. PubMed ID: 19736151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to read a review paper.
    Callcut RA; Branson RD
    Respir Care; 2009 Oct; 54(10):1379-85. PubMed ID: 19796419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A practical guide to understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Neely JG; Magit AE; Rich JT; Voelker CC; Wang EW; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Bradley JP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jan; 142(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20096216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can you see the wood for the trees? Making sense of forest plots in systematic reviews 2. Analysis of the combined results from the included studies.
    Hyde CJ; Stanworth SJ; Murphy MF
    Transfusion; 2008 Apr; 48(4):580-3. PubMed ID: 18194387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.
    Montori VM; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
    BMC Med; 2003 Nov; 1():2. PubMed ID: 14633274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to write a Cochrane systematic review.
    Henderson LK; Craig JC; Willis NS; Tovey D; Webster AC
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Sep; 15(6):617-24. PubMed ID: 20883282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality.
    Cornelius VR; Perrio MJ; Shakir SA; Smith LA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1223-31. PubMed ID: 19757414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Susceptibility to fraud in systematic reviews: lessons from the Reuben case.
    Marret E; Elia N; Dahl JB; McQuay HJ; Møiniche S; Moore RA; Straube S; Tramèr MR
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Dec; 111(6):1279-89. PubMed ID: 19934873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finding your way out of the forest without a trail of bread crumbs: development and evaluation of two novel displays of forest plots.
    Schild AH; Voracek M
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 26035471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.