These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20093520)

  • 21. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
    Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Whole-body 3D T1-weighted MR imaging in patients with prostate cancer: feasibility and evaluation in screening for metastatic disease.
    Pasoglou V; Michoux N; Peeters F; Larbi A; Tombal B; Selleslagh T; Omoumi P; Vande Berg BC; Lecouvet FE
    Radiology; 2015 Apr; 275(1):155-66. PubMed ID: 25513855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. T staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging compared with T2-weighted imaging on 3.0 tesla MRI.
    Feng Q; Yan YQ; Zhu J; Xu JR
    J Dig Dis; 2014 Apr; 15(4):188-94. PubMed ID: 24373561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.
    Yoon LS; Catalano OA; Fritz S; Ferrone CR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 19478628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.
    Winter L; Bruhn H; Langrehr J; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Hänninen LE
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 17453515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Endometriosis: contribution of 3.0-T pelvic MR imaging in preoperative assessment--initial results.
    Hottat N; Larrousse C; Anaf V; Noël JC; Matos C; Absil J; Metens T
    Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 19584256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Staging urinary bladder cancer: value of T1-weighted three-dimensional magnetization prepared-rapid gradient-echo and two-dimensional spin-echo sequences.
    Barentsz JO; Jager G; Mugler JP; Oosterhof G; Peters H; van Erning LT; Ruijs SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 7998522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Uterine cervical carcinoma: a comparison of two- and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T for image quality and local-regional staging.
    Shin YR; Rha SE; Choi BG; Oh SN; Park MY; Byun JY
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Apr; 23(4):1150-7. PubMed ID: 22868482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three-dimensional dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility and contrast agent dose.
    Manka C; Träber F; Gieseke J; Schild HH; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):869-77. PubMed ID: 15665227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. MR imaging of endometrial carcinoma for preoperative staging at 3.0 T: comparison with imaging at 1.5 T.
    Hori M; Kim T; Murakami T; Imaoka I; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Nakaya Y; Tomoda K; Tsutsui T; Enomoto T; Kimura T; Nakamura H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):621-30. PubMed ID: 19711413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.
    Meyenberger C; Huch Böni RA; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP
    Endoscopy; 1995 Sep; 27(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 8565885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rectal cancer: assessment of complete response to preoperative combined radiation therapy with chemotherapy--conventional MR volumetry versus diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
    Curvo-Semedo L; Lambregts DM; Maas M; Thywissen T; Mehsen RT; Lammering G; Beets GL; Caseiro-Alves F; Beets-Tan RG
    Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):734-43. PubMed ID: 21673229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
    Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of thin section magnetic resonance using phased-array pelvic coil in predicting the T-staging of rectal cancer.
    Poon FW; McDonald A; Anderson JH; Duthie F; Rodger C; McCurrach G; McKee RF; Horgan PG; Foulis AK; Chong D; Finlay IG
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Feb; 53(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 15664289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation body MR imaging compared with standard MR imaging at 3.0 T: initial clinical experience.
    Willinek WA; Gieseke J; Kukuk GM; Nelles M; König R; Morakkabati-Spitz N; Träber F; Thomas D; Kuhl CK; Schild HH
    Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 20720078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characterization of adrenal lesions: comparison of 2D and 3D dual gradient-echo MR imaging at 3 T--preliminary results.
    Marin D; Soher BJ; Dale BM; Boll DT; Youngblood RS; Merkle EM
    Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 20032151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Three-dimensional isotropic shoulder MR arthrography: comparison with two-dimensional MR arthrography for the diagnosis of labral lesions at 3.0 T.
    Jung JY; Yoon YC; Choi SH; Kwon JW; Yoo J; Choe BK
    Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):498-505. PubMed ID: 19188318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional sequences.
    Czerny C; Rand T; Gstoettner W; Woelfl G; Imhof H; Trattnig S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 9490977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preoperative T staging of urinary bladder cancer: does diffusion-weighted MRI have supplementary value?
    Watanabe H; Kanematsu M; Kondo H; Goshima S; Tsuge Y; Onozuka M; Moriyama N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 May; 192(5):1361-6. PubMed ID: 19380561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.