205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20093569)
1. Image quality and bile duct volumetry in MR cholangiopancreatography augmented with low-dose morphine.
Kröpil P; Erhardt A; Mehnert S; Beck A; Häussinger D; Mödder U; Blondin D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):W171-5. PubMed ID: 20093569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Morphine- and glucagon-augmented magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to evaluate living liver donors.
Mo YH; Liang PC; Ho MC; Lee PH; Jaw FS; Peng SS
Liver Transpl; 2009 Sep; 15(9):1021-7. PubMed ID: 19718648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients.
Onishi H; Kim T; Hori M; Murakami T; Tatsumi M; Nakaya Y; Nakamoto A; Osuga K; Tomoda K; Nakamura H
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):559-65. PubMed ID: 19692840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 2D thick-slab MR cholangiopancreatography: does parallel imaging with sensitivity encoding improve image quality and duct visualization?
Hosseinzadeh K; Furlan A; Almusa O
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W327-34. PubMed ID: 18492874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical impact of 3-dimensional balanced turbo-field-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 T: prospective intraindividual comparison with 3-dimensional turbo-spin-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Itatani R; Namimoto T; Takaoka H; Katahira K; Noda S; Toyonari N; Yamashita Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25299796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2D single-shot fast spin-echo and 3D fast spin-echo sequences.
Cova M; Stacul F; Cester G; Ukmar M; Pozzi Mucelli R
Radiol Med; 2003 Sep; 106(3):178-90. PubMed ID: 14612839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fentanyl-augmented MRCP.
Agarwal S; Nag P; Sikora S; Prasad TL; Kumar S; Gupta RK
Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(5):582-7. PubMed ID: 16465580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quality rating of MR-cholangiopancreatography with oral application of iron oxide particles].
Lorenzen M; Wedegärtner U; Fiehler J; Adam G
Rofo; 2003 Jul; 175(7):936-41. PubMed ID: 12847648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3.0- Versus 1.5-T MR cholangiography: a pilot study.
Merkle EM; Haugan PA; Thomas J; Jaffe TA; Gullotto C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Feb; 186(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 16423962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.
Yoon LS; Catalano OA; Fritz S; Ferrone CR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 19478628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parallel imaging improves the image quality and duct visibility of breathhold two-dimensional thick-slab MR cholangiopancreatography.
Lee JH; Lee SS; Kim JY; Kim IS; Byun JH; Park SH; Lee MG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 39(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 23596083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo techniques.
Sodickson A; Mortele KJ; Barish MA; Zou KH; Thibodeau S; Tempany CM
Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):549-59. PubMed ID: 16436816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR cholangiopancreatography of pancreaticobiliary diseases: comparison of single-shot RARE and multislice HASTE sequences.
Morrin MM; Farrell RJ; McEntee G; MacMathuna P; Stack JP; Murray JG
Clin Radiol; 2000 Nov; 55(11):866-73. PubMed ID: 11069743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MRCP imaging at 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T: preliminary experience in healthy volunteers.
Isoda H; Kataoka M; Maetani Y; Kido A; Umeoka S; Tamai K; Koyama T; Nakamoto Y; Miki Y; Saga T; Togashi K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(5):1000-6. PubMed ID: 17410562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does intravenous glucagon improve common bile duct visualisation during magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Results in 42 patients.
Dalal PU; Howlett DC; Sallomi DF; Marchbank ND; Watson GM; Marr A; Dunk AA; Smith AD
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Mar; 49(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 14962656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High spatial resolution 3D MR cholangiography with high sampling efficiency technique (SPACE): comparison of 3T vs. 1.5T.
Arizono S; Isoda H; Maetani YS; Hirokawa Y; Shimada K; Nakamoto Y; Shibata T; Togashi K
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 73(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 18834686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of the SPACE pulse sequence at 1.5T MR cholangiography: comparison of image quality and image acquisition time with conventional 3D-TSE sequence.
Nakaura T; Kidoh M; Maruyama N; Kawahara T; Namimoto T; Sakai Y; Harada K; Yamashita Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 38(5):1014-9. PubMed ID: 24105679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Usefulness of T2-weighted images using single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) pulse sequence for the evaluation of pancreatobiliary diseases: comparison with MRCP using SSFSE].
Kadoya M; Gabata T; Matsui O; Kawamori Y; Takashima T; Matsuura Y; Kurata Y; Kawahara K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2836-41. PubMed ID: 9847606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usefulness of the Short-Echo Time Cube Sequence at 3-T Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: Prospective Comparison With the Conventional 3-Dimensional Fast Spin-Echo Sequence.
Itatani R; Namimoto T; Kusunoki S; Mizuguchi T; Ohtsuka S; Yamashita Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 26966952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bile duct leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: value of contrast-enhanced MRCP.
Aduna M; Larena JA; Martín D; Martínez-Guereñu B; Aguirre I; Astigarraga E
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(4):480-7. PubMed ID: 15688109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
