682 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20093573)
1. Dose and image quality evaluation of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for high-contrast neurologic applications.
Yu L; Vrieze TJ; Bruesewitz MR; Kofler JM; DeLone DR; Pallanch JF; Lindell EP; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):W193-201. PubMed ID: 20093573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.
Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER
J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kilovoltage cone-beam CT: comparative dose and image quality evaluations in partial and full-angle scan protocols.
Kim S; Yoo S; Yin FF; Samei E; Yoshizumi T
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3648-59. PubMed ID: 20831072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shading correction for on-board cone-beam CT in radiation therapy using planning MDCT images.
Niu T; Sun M; Star-Lack J; Gao H; Fan Q; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5395-406. PubMed ID: 21089775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of radiation doses between cone beam CT and multi detector CT: TLD measurements.
Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Yoo S; Yin FF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 19074786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans.
Veldhoen S; Schöllchen M; Hanken H; Precht C; Henes FO; Schön G; Nagel HD; Schumacher U; Heiland M; Adam G; Regier M
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):790-800. PubMed ID: 27169574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone-beam CT dose and imaging performance evaluation with a modular, multipurpose phantom.
Siewerdsen JH; Uneri A; Hernandez AM; Burkett GW; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):467-479. PubMed ID: 31808950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical assessment of a prototype cone-beam CT system for imaging of acute intracranial hemorrhage.
Xu J; Sisniega A; Zbijewski W; Dang H; Stayman JW; Mow M; Wang X; Foos DH; Koliatsos VE; Aygun N; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5745. PubMed ID: 27782694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correction of image artifacts from treatment couch in cone-beam CT from kV on-board imaging.
Ali I; Ahmad S; Alsbou N; Lovelock DM; Kriminski S; Amols H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2011; 19(3):321-32. PubMed ID: 21876282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
Peng Y; Li J; Ma D; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Zeng J; Sun G
Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19922316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A dose-neutral image quality comparison of different CBCT and CT systems using paranasal sinus imaging protocols and phantoms.
Ronkainen AP; Al-Gburi A; Liimatainen T; Matikka H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Sep; 279(9):4407-4414. PubMed ID: 35084532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Twin Robotic X-Ray System for 3D Cone-Beam CT of the Wrist: An Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose.
Grunz JP; Gietzen CH; Kunz AS; Weng AM; Veyhl-Wichmann M; Ergün S; Bley TA; Schmitt R; Gassenmaier T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Feb; 214(2):422-427. PubMed ID: 31799871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of image quality for different kV cone-beam CT acquisition and reconstruction methods in the head and neck region.
Elstrøm UV; Muren LP; Petersen JB; Grau C
Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):908-17. PubMed ID: 21767191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone beam CT paranasal sinuses versus standard multidetector and low dose multidetector CT studies.
Al Abduwani J; ZilinSkiene L; Colley S; Ahmed S
Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 26700263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Radiation Dose from Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Multidetector Computed Tomography in Examinations of the Hand.
Neubauer J; Neubauer C; Gerstmair A; Krauss T; Reising K; Zajonc H; Kotter E; Langer M; Fiebich M; Voigt J
Rofo; 2016 May; 188(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 26981913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners.
Pauwels R; Beinsberger J; Stamatakis H; Tsiklakis K; Walker A; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R; Horner K;
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jul; 114(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 22727102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
