These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20093599)
1. Solitary dilated duct identified at mammography: outcomes analysis. Chang CB; Lvoff NM; Leung JW; Brenner RJ; Joe BN; Tso HH; Sickles EA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):378-82. PubMed ID: 20093599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dilated duct pattern at mammography. Huynh PT; Parellada JA; de Paredes ES; Harvey J; Smith D; Holley L; Maxin M Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 9205235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings. Leung JW; Sickles EA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):667-75. PubMed ID: 17312052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up. Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Abraham LA; Lehman CD; Yankaskas BC; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Voeks JH; Geller BM; Carney PA; Sickles EA Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 15734926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of solitary dilated breast ducts in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Choudhery S; Simmons C; Woodard GA; Bhatt AA; Anderson TL; Lee CU Br J Radiol; 2020 May; 93(1109):20191039. PubMed ID: 32101458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic screening of TRAM flap breast reconstructions for detection of nonpalpable recurrent cancer. Helvie MA; Bailey JE; Roubidoux MA; Pass HA; Chang AE; Pierce LJ; Wilkins EG Radiology; 2002 Jul; 224(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 12091685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Solitary breast papilloma: comparison of mammographic, galactographic, and pathologic findings. Woods ER; Helvie MA; Ikeda DM; Mandell SH; Chapel KL; Adler DD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):487-91. PubMed ID: 1503011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Small (< 2.0-cm) breast cancers: mammographic and US findings at US-guided cryoablation--initial experience. Roubidoux MA; Sabel MS; Bailey JE; Kleer CG; Klein KA; Helvie MA Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):857-67. PubMed ID: 15567802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positive predictive value of breast cancer in the lesions categorized as BI-RADS category 5. Wiratkapun C; Lertsithichai P; Wibulpholprasert B J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Aug; 89(8):1253-9. PubMed ID: 17048437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound. Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Follow-up of probably benign lesions in non-screening breast diagnostics. Kapsimalakou S; Waldmann A; Katalinic A; Grande-Nagel I; Fischer D; Barkhausen J; Vogt FM Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):543-51. PubMed ID: 24722993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biopsy rate and positive predictive value for breast cancer in BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions. Wiratkapun C; Bunyapaiboonsri W; Wibulpolprasert B; Lertsithichai P J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Jul; 93(7):830-7. PubMed ID: 20649064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance. Frankel SD; Sickles EA; Curpen BN; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1107-9. PubMed ID: 7717214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjunctive diagnostic value of ultrasonography evaluation in patients with suspected ductal breast disease. Ballesio L; Maggi C; Savelli S; Angeletti M; Rabuffi P; Manganaro L; Porfiri LM Radiol Med; 2007 Apr; 112(3):354-65. PubMed ID: 17440697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Columnar cell lesions of the breast: mammographic and US features. Kim MJ; Kim EK; Oh KK; Park BW; Kim H Eur J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 60(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 16891081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive value of BI-RADS classification for breast imaging in women under age 50. Kennedy G; Markert M; Alexander JR; Avisar E Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Dec; 130(3):819-23. PubMed ID: 21748292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]