844 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20093608)
1. Prostate cancer: Comparison of 3D T2-weighted with conventional 2D T2-weighted imaging for image quality and tumor detection.
Rosenkrantz AB; Neil J; Kong X; Melamed J; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Taouli B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):446-52. PubMed ID: 20093608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uterine tumors: comparison of 3D versus 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T--initial experience.
Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Ueguchi T; Tatsumi M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Tomoda K; Tomiyama N
Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 21045182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative 3T MR imaging of rectal cancer: local staging accuracy using a two-dimensional and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence.
Fütterer JJ; Yakar D; Strijk SP; Barentsz JO
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18164156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preliminary clinical experience at 3 T with a 3D T2-weighted sequence compared with multiplanar 2D for evaluation of the female pelvis.
Hecht EM; Yitta S; Lim RP; Fitzgerald EF; Storey P; Babb JS; Bani-Baker KO; Bennett GL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):W346-52. PubMed ID: 21785064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hormonal ablation of prostatic cancer: effects on prostate morphology, tumor detection, and staging by endorectal coil MR imaging.
Chen M; Hricak H; Kalbhen CL; Kurhanewicz J; Vigneron DB; Weiss JM; Carroll PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 8615261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional isotropic T2-weighted cervical MRI at 3T: comparison with two-dimensional T2-weighted sequences.
Kwon JW; Yoon YC; Choi SH
Clin Radiol; 2012 Feb; 67(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 22142499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rectal cancer: comparison of accuracy of local-regional staging with two- and three-dimensional preoperative 3-T MR imaging.
Kim H; Lim JS; Choi JY; Park J; Chung YE; Kim MJ; Choi E; Kim NK; Kim KW
Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 20093520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of carotid atherosclerosis with black-blood carotid plaque imaging using variable flip-angle 3D turbo spin-echo: comparison with 2D turbo spin-echo sequences.
Takano K; Yamashita S; Takemoto K; Inoue T; Sakata N; Kuwabara Y; Yoshimitsu K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e304-9. PubMed ID: 22115798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo intermediate-weighted sequence with refocusing control in knee imaging: comparison study with 3D isotropic fast-field echo sequence.
Seo JM; Yoon YC; Kwon JW
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1119-24. PubMed ID: 22144425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional sequences.
Czerny C; Rand T; Gstoettner W; Woelfl G; Imhof H; Trattnig S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 9490977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging with tissue-specific variable refocusing flip angle for 3-T magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison with conventional two- and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging.
Tanaka U; Ueno Y; Morinaga Y; Miyake H; Kyotani K; Ueda Y; Kitajima K; Sofue K; Suenaga Y; Sugimura K; Takahashi S
Jpn J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):707-717. PubMed ID: 28983811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of wrist MRI at 3.0T: comparison between isotropic 3D turbo spin echo and isotropic 3D fast field echo and 2D turbo spin echo.
Jung JY; Yoon YC; Jung JY; Choe BK
Acta Radiol; 2013 Apr; 54(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 23319720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D-MRI of the ankle with optimized 3D-SPACE.
Notohamiprodjo M; Kuschel B; Horng A; Paul D; Baer P; Li G; Garcia del Olmo JM; Reiser MF; Glaser C
Invest Radiol; 2012 Apr; 47(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 22373531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Staging urinary bladder cancer: value of T1-weighted three-dimensional magnetization prepared-rapid gradient-echo and two-dimensional spin-echo sequences.
Barentsz JO; Jager G; Mugler JP; Oosterhof G; Peters H; van Erning LT; Ruijs SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 7998522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endorectal 3D T2-weighted 1mm-slice thickness MRI for prostate cancer staging at 1.5Tesla: should we reconsider the indirects signs of extracapsular extension according to the D'Amico tumor risk criteria?
Cornud F; Rouanne M; Beuvon F; Eiss D; Flam T; Liberatore M; Zerbib M; Delongchamps NB
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e591-7. PubMed ID: 21871750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [MRI of the regions of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle using a 3D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence. Comparison with conventional 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences].
Czerny C; Trattnig S; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Imhof H
Rofo; 1997 Oct; 167(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 9417266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fast spin-echo MR images of the pelvis obtained with a phased-array coil: value in localizing and staging prostatic carcinoma.
Kier R; Wain S; Troiano R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):601-6. PubMed ID: 8352116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo MRI of the spine using parallel imaging.
Ruel L; Brugières P; Luciani A; Breil S; Mathieu D; Rahmouni A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):749-55. PubMed ID: 14975981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
