BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20093610)

  • 1. Process improvement: what is it, why is it important, and how is it done?
    Johnson CD; Miranda R; Aakre KT; Roberts CC; Patel MD; Krecke KN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):461-8. PubMed ID: 20093610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
    Benedetto AR
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RADPEER scoring white paper.
    Jackson VP; Cushing T; Abujudeh HH; Borgstede JP; Chin KW; Grimes CK; Larson DB; Larson PA; Pyatt RS; Thorwarth WT
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jan; 6(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19111267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality assessment and improvement: what radiologists do and think.
    Deitch CH; Chan WC; Sunshine JH; Zinninger MD; Cascade PN; Cochran ST
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1245-54. PubMed ID: 7976910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acceptance of PACS utilizing a PACS QI Program.
    Stockman T; Krishnan S
    Radiol Manage; 2006; 28(2):16-8, 20-7; quiz 28-9. PubMed ID: 16676877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Core processes: a simplified approach to performance improvement.
    Harlan KW
    Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(3):46-50. PubMed ID: 10180226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient-centered care.
    Molloy W
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Sep; 11(9):14-6, 19-20. PubMed ID: 10121762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quality management systems in radiology: implementation in hospital and radiology practice].
    Teichgräber U; de Bucourt M
    Rofo; 2010 Nov; 182(11):986-92. PubMed ID: 20577939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality initiatives: developing a radiology quality and safety program: a primer.
    Johnson CD; Krecke KN; Miranda R; Roberts CC; Denham C
    Radiographics; 2009; 29(4):951-9. PubMed ID: 19448105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.
    Shaller D
    Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 2):217-27. PubMed ID: 14702504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiology peer review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care.
    Halsted MJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):984-7. PubMed ID: 17411742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality-service connection.
    Valdez F
    Adm Radiol; 1995 Aug; 14(8):16, 19-21. PubMed ID: 10151502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiology discrepancies plaguing ED managers.
    ED Manag; 2005 Jul; 17(7):76-8. PubMed ID: 16022230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A quality reference manual for radiology].
    de Chambine S; Hurlimann C; Simon JM; Bertrand D; Larédo JD
    J Radiol; 1999 Aug; 80(8):825-34. PubMed ID: 10470611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance-based assessment of radiology faculty: a practical plan to promote improvement and meet JCAHO standards.
    Donnelly LF; Strife JL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May; 184(5):1398-401. PubMed ID: 15855086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategies for establishing a comprehensive quality and performance improvement program in a radiology department.
    Kruskal JB; Anderson S; Yam CS; Sosna J
    Radiographics; 2009; 29(2):315-29. PubMed ID: 19168762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality control issues. Governing the radiation physicist.
    Tolbert DD; Hubbard LB; Bushong SC; Khan FM; Payne JT
    Adm Radiol; 1989 Sep; 8(9):46-50, 52. PubMed ID: 10294846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiology peer-review feedback scorecards: optimizing transparency, accessibility, and education in a children׳s hospital.
    Iyer RS; Munsell A; Weinberger E
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 24948210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mitigating Misdiagnosis in Radiology: Educational CT CME Case Conference for Peer Review and Interpretative Improvement.
    Johnson PT; Badger D; Horton KM; Fishman EK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1244-1246. PubMed ID: 27474418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates.
    Borgstede JP; Lewis RS; Bhargavan M; Sunshine JH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 17411521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.