These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2009383)

  • 1. Regulation of biotechnology by the Environmental Protection Agency.
    Rogul M; Levin M
    Biotechnology; 1991; 15():233-65. PubMed ID: 2009383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biotechnology regulation.
    Krimsky S
    Science; 1995 Feb; 267(5200):945. PubMed ID: 7863334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A need to reinvent biotechnology regulation at the EPA.
    Miller HI
    Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5192):1815-8. PubMed ID: 7997875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
    Hoffman DE
    Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):807-8. PubMed ID: 11533629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Policy: Reboot the debate on genetic engineering.
    Kuzma J
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7593):165-7. PubMed ID: 26961641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GM advisory panel is slanted, say critics.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1999 May; 399(6731):7. PubMed ID: 10331376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US sends mixed message in GM debate...as questions emerge over cost-effectiveness.
    Reichhardt T
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6742):298. PubMed ID: 10432097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concerns over refuge size for US EPA-approved Bt corn.
    Powell K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):467-8. PubMed ID: 12721555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biotechnology regulation.
    Bereano PL
    Science; 1989 Apr; 244(4902):275-6. PubMed ID: 2711181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EPA, environmental release, and the regulatory process.
    Farnham P
    FASEB J; 1989 Apr; 3(6):1687-8. PubMed ID: 2703105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. US Environmental Protection Agency sued over toxic air pollutants.
    Nelson R
    Lancet Respir Med; 2015 May; 3(5):346. PubMed ID: 25908539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aventis gets short shrift over release of modified corn.
    Netting J
    Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6811):395. PubMed ID: 11100697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulatory oversight in developing nations.
    Dirie AM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):547-8. PubMed ID: 12042849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. US groups sue over approval of Bt crops...as UK press reports come under fire.
    Masood E
    Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6721):636-7. PubMed ID: 10067881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GM crops and the pesticide paradigm.
    Welsh R; Hubbell B; Ervin DE; Jahn M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):548-9. PubMed ID: 12042850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Charges in environmental release laws possible.
    Ezzell C
    Nature; 1988 May; 333(6168):2. PubMed ID: 3163104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.