BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20093978)

  • 1. Biomechanical testing of two devices for internal fixation of fractured ribs.
    Campbell N; Richardson M; Antippa P
    J Trauma; 2010 May; 68(5):1234-8. PubMed ID: 20093978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Less-invasive stabilization of rib fractures by intramedullary fixation: a biomechanical evaluation.
    Bottlang M; Helzel I; Long W; Fitzpatrick D; Madey S
    J Trauma; 2010 May; 68(5):1218-24. PubMed ID: 20068479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures using Inion OTPS wraps--techniques and quality of life follow-up.
    Campbell N; Conaglen P; Martin K; Antippa P
    J Trauma; 2009 Sep; 67(3):596-601. PubMed ID: 19741406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Biodegradable meniscus fixations: a comparative biomechanical study].
    Seil R; Rupp S; Jurecka C; Georg T; Kohn D
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Feb; 89(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 12610434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mode of failure of rib fixation with absorbable plates: a clinical and numerical modeling study.
    Marasco SF; Sutalo ID; Bui AV
    J Trauma; 2010 May; 68(5):1225-33. PubMed ID: 20453773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of contemporary clavicle fixation devices.
    Renfree T; Conrad B; Wright T
    J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 35(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 20138445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures.
    Otto RJ; Moed BR; Bledsoe JG
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 19897986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of divergent screw placement on the initial strength of plate-to-bone fixation.
    Robert KQ; Chandler R; Baratta RV; Thomas KA; Harris MB
    J Trauma; 2003 Dec; 55(6):1139-44. PubMed ID: 14676661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.
    Crist BD; Khalafi A; Hazelwood SJ; Lee MA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
    O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suture versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
    Bong MR; Romero A; Kubiak E; Iesaka K; Heywood CS; Kummer F; Rosen J; Jazrawi L
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1172-6. PubMed ID: 16226643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of intramedullary rib splints for less-invasive stabilisation of rib fractures.
    Helzel I; Long W; Fitzpatrick D; Madey S; Bottlang M
    Injury; 2009 Oct; 40(10):1104-10. PubMed ID: 19573871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate.
    Krischak GD; Augat P; Beck A; Arand M; Baier B; Blakytny R; Gebhard F; Claes L
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Dec; 22(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17900766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Biomechanical comparative study of three types of osteosynthesis in the treatment of supra and intercondylar fractures of the humerus in adults].
    Fornasiéri C; Staub C; Tourné Y; Rumelhart C; Saragaglia D
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9255359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur. A biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques.
    Blair B; Koval KJ; Kummer F; Zuckerman JD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Sep; (306):256-63. PubMed ID: 8070205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical comparison of bicortical versus unicortical screw placement of proximal tibia locking plates: a cadaveric model.
    Dougherty PJ; Kim DG; Meisterling S; Wybo C; Yeni Y
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jul; 22(6):399-403. PubMed ID: 18594304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fixation properties of a biodegradable "free-form" osteosynthesis plate.
    Väänänen P; Nurmi JT; Nuutinen JP; Jakonen S; Happonen H; Jank S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 18554937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of double-row locking plates versus single- and double-row non-locking plates in a comminuted metacarpal fracture model.
    Gajendran VK; Szabo RM; Myo GK; Curtiss SB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Dec; 34(10):1851-8. PubMed ID: 19897325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pullout strength of a biodegradable free form osteosynthesis plate.
    Jank S; Väänänen P; Kloss FR; Nurmi JT; Nuutinen JP; Jakonen S; Happonen H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 38(7):517-21. PubMed ID: 20378367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a short glass fibre-reinforced tube as a model for cat femur for biomechanical testing of orthopaedic implants.
    Gibson TW; Moens NM; Runciman RJ; Holmberg DL
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 18536844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.