247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20094805)
1. Deriving SF-12v2 physical and mental health summary scores: a comparison of different scoring algorithms.
Fleishman JA; Selim AJ; Kazis LE
Qual Life Res; 2010 Mar; 19(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 20094805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance of the English, Mandarin, and Malay versions of the SF-12v2 within a representative sample of the multi-ethnic Singapore population.
Lau JH; Abdin E; Vaingankar JA; Shafie S; Sambasivam R; Shahwan S; Thumboo J; Chong SA; Subramaniam M
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Mar; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 33691707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The SF-36 summary scales: problems and solutions.
Wilson D; Parsons J; Tucker G
Soz Praventivmed; 2000; 45(6):239-46. PubMed ID: 11210594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The 12-item medical outcomes study short form health survey version 2.0 (SF-12v2): a population-based validation study from Tehran, Iran.
Montazeri A; Vahdaninia M; Mousavi SJ; Asadi-Lari M; Omidvari S; Tavousi M
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2011 Mar; 9():12. PubMed ID: 21385359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New Australian population scoring coefficients for the old version of the SF-36 and SF-12 health status questionnaires.
Tucker G; Adams R; Wilson D
Qual Life Res; 2010 Sep; 19(7):1069-76. PubMed ID: 20440565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement properties of the 12-item Short Form Health Survey version 2 in Australians with lung cancer: a Rasch analysis.
Soh SE; Morello R; Ayton D; Ahern S; Scarborough R; Zammit C; Brand M; Stirling RG; Zalcberg J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 May; 19(1):157. PubMed ID: 34059079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the sf-12v2 health survey among adults with hemophilia.
Shah RM; Banahan BF; Holmes ER; Patel AS; Barnard M; Khanna R; Bentley JP
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Dec; 16(1):229. PubMed ID: 30545375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Results from several population studies show that recommended scoring methods of the SF-36 and the SF-12 may lead to incorrect conclusions and subsequent health decisions.
Tucker G; Adams R; Wilson D
Qual Life Res; 2014 Oct; 23(8):2195-203. PubMed ID: 24648191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The SF-36v2 and SF-12v2 health surveys in New Zealand: norms, scoring coefficients and cross-country comparisons.
Frieling MA; Davis WR; Chiang G
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2013 Feb; 37(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 23379802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scoring Mental Health Quality of Life With the SF-36 in Patients With and Without Diabetes Foot Complications.
Ahn J; Del Core MA; Wukich DK; Liu GT; Lalli T; VanPelt MD; La Fontaine J; Lavery LA; Raspovic KM
Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2018 Mar; 17(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 29546783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of Reliability and Validity of SF-12v2 among a Diabetic Population.
Kathe N; Hayes CJ; Bhandari NR; Payakachat N
Value Health; 2018 Apr; 21(4):432-440. PubMed ID: 29680100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, V.I.
Farivar SS; Cunningham WE; Hays RD
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2007 Sep; 5():54. PubMed ID: 17825096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the SF-12 version 2 Health Survey a valid and equivalent substitute for the SF-36 version 2 Health Survey for the Chinese?
Lam ET; Lam CL; Fong DY; Huang WW
J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Feb; 19(1):200-8. PubMed ID: 22128754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.
Ware JE; Gandek B; Kosinski M; Aaronson NK; Apolone G; Brazier J; Bullinger M; Kaasa S; Leplège A; Prieto L; Sullivan M; Thunedborg K
J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):1167-70. PubMed ID: 9817134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Construct Validity of the SF-12v2 for the Homeless Population with Mental Illness: An Instrument to Measure Self-Reported Mental and Physical Health.
Chum A; Skosireva A; Tobon J; Hwang S
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0148856. PubMed ID: 26938990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Construct validity of the SF-12 in three different samples.
Jakobsson U; Westergren A; Lindskov S; Hagell P
J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Jun; 18(3):560-6. PubMed ID: 21210901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The SF-36 in multiple sclerosis: why basic assumptions must be tested.
Hobart J; Freeman J; Lamping D; Fitzpatrick R; Thompson A
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2001 Sep; 71(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 11511712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.
Ware JE; Kosinski M; Gandek B; Aaronson NK; Apolone G; Bech P; Brazier J; Bullinger M; Kaasa S; Leplège A; Prieto L; Sullivan M
J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):1159-65. PubMed ID: 9817133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Observed agreement problems between sub-scales and summary components of the SF-36 version 2 - an alternative scoring method can correct the problem.
Tucker G; Adams R; Wilson D
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61191. PubMed ID: 23593428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population.
Kontodimopoulos N; Pappa E; Niakas D; Tountas Y
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2007 Sep; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17900374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
