These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20095195)

  • 1. A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single-tooth restorations.
    Wittneben JG; Wright RF; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 20095195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Tooth-Supported Ceramic Restorations: A Systematic Review.
    Alves de Carvalho IF; Santos Marques TM; Araújo FM; Azevedo LF; Donato H; Correia A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(4):e68-e78. PubMed ID: 29889916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Particle-Filled Composite Resin CAD/CAM Partial Crowns after 24 Months.
    Zimmermann M; Koller C; Reymus M; Mehl A; Hickel R
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Oct; 27(8):694-699. PubMed ID: 28422359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reasons for Failure of CAD/CAM Restorations in Clinical Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lampl S; Gurunathan D; Krithikadatta J; Mehta D; Moodley D
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Feb; 24(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 37272145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective observation of CAD/CAM titanium ceramic single crowns: a three-year follow up.
    Boeckler AF; Lee H; Stadler A; Setz JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Nov; 102(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 19853170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures.
    Kapos T; Evans C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29 Suppl():117-36. PubMed ID: 24660194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CAD/CAM or conventional ceramic materials restorations longevity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Rodrigues SB; Franken P; Celeste RK; Leitune VCB; Collares FM
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Oct; 63(4):389-395. PubMed ID: 31303569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single crowns with CAD/CAM-fabricated copings from titanium: 6-year clinical results.
    Hey J; Beuer F; Bensel T; Boeckler AF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 24529840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An overview of the CEREC 3D CAD/CAM system.
    Allen KL; Schenkel AB; Estafan D
    Gen Dent; 2004; 52(3):234-5. PubMed ID: 15206254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical performance of two different CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic crowns: 2-Year results.
    Seydler B; Schmitter M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 25935085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical long-term results with 617 Cerec veneers: a nine-year report.
    Wiedhahn K; Kerschbaum T; Fasbinder DF
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Jul; 8(3):233-46. PubMed ID: 16416936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Otto T; De Nisco S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival and complications of computer aided-designing and computer-aided manufacturing vs. conventionally fabricated implant-supported reconstructions: a systematic review.
    Harder S; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():48-54. PubMed ID: 19663948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developing meaningful systematic review of CAD/CAM reconstructions and fiber-reinforced composites.
    Kelly JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18 Suppl 3():205-17. PubMed ID: 17594383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 5.5-year-survival of CAD/CAM resin-based composite restorations in severe tooth wear patients.
    Maier E; Crins L; Pereira-Cenci T; Bronkhorst E; Opdam N; Galler K; Loomans B
    Dent Mater; 2024 May; 40(5):767-776. PubMed ID: 38458918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restorative material options for CAD/CAM restorations.
    Fasbinder DJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Oct; 23(10):911-6, 918, 920 passim; quiz 924. PubMed ID: 12434616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evolution of a chairside CAD/CAM system for dental restorations.
    Hehn S
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Jun; 22(6 Suppl):4-6. PubMed ID: 11913286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.