103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20095255)
21. 2D harmonic filtering of MR phase images in multicenter clinical setting: toward a magnetic signature of cerebral microbleeds.
Kaaouana T; de Rochefort L; Samaille T; Thiery N; Dufouil C; Delmaire C; Dormont D; Chupin M
Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 104():287-300. PubMed ID: 25149849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MRI and comparison mammography: a worthy diagnostic alliance for breast microcalcifications?
Brnic D; Brnic D; Simundic I; Vanjaka Rogosic L; Tadic T
Acta Radiol; 2016 Apr; 57(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 25995311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Differentiation between diamagnetic and paramagnetic cerebral lesions based on magnetic susceptibility mapping.
Schweser F; Deistung A; Lehr BW; Reichenbach JR
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5165-78. PubMed ID: 21089750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.
Chen B; Ning R
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):755-70. PubMed ID: 12033572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Liberman L; Smolkin JH; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Rosen PP
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):251-60. PubMed ID: 9646821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [40 years of progress in breast imaging].
De Maulmont C; Cherel P; Ouhioun O; Becette V; Stevens D; Plantet MM; Hagay C
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2000 Nov; 48(9):801-11. PubMed ID: 11141915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].
Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ.
Soderstrom CE; Harms SE; Copit DS; Evans WP; Savino DA; Krakos PA; Farrell RS; Flamig DP
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):427-32. PubMed ID: 8888235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. High-resolution breast tomography at high energy: a feasibility study of phase contrast imaging on a whole breast.
Sztrókay A; Diemoz PC; Schlossbauer T; Brun E; Bamberg F; Mayr D; Reiser MF; Bravin A; Coan P
Phys Med Biol; 2012 May; 57(10):2931-42. PubMed ID: 22516937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Usefulness of MRI of microcalcification lesions to determine the indication for stereotactic mammotome biopsy.
Kikuchi M; Tanino H; Kosaka Y; Sengoku N; Yamashita K; Minatani N; Nishimiya H; Waraya M; Katoh H; Enomoto T; Kajita S; Woodhams R; Watanabe M
Anticancer Res; 2014 Nov; 34(11):6749-53. PubMed ID: 25368286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [MRI outstands mammogram in sensitivity of breast ductal carcinoma in situ:an analysis of 122 cases].
Yu QX; Chen XS; Wu JY; Han BS; He JR; Zhu L; Chen WG; Li YF; Tan L; Chai WM; Wang DB; Fei XC; Yuan F; Jin XL; Shen KW; Li HW
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 23578423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Breast calcification imaging.
Baldwin P
Radiol Technol; 2013; 84(4):383M-404M; quiz 405M-408M. PubMed ID: 23547207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience.
Jong RA; Yaffe MJ; Skarpathiotakis M; Shumak RS; Danjoux NM; Gunesekara A; Plewes DB
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):842-50. PubMed ID: 12881585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):483-5. PubMed ID: 1323923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Projection MR imaging of peripheral arterial calcifications.
Edelman RR; Flanagan O; Grodzki D; Giri S; Gupta N; Koktzoglou I
Magn Reson Med; 2015 May; 73(5):1939-45. PubMed ID: 24957402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Changing patterns of microcalcification on screening mammography for prediction of breast cancer.
Kim KI; Lee KH; Kim TR; Chun YS; Lee TH; Choi HY; Park HK
Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 25651818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
